Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191382›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2022

Prognostic performance of Controlling Nutritional Status score in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Ahmet Zengin, Mehmet Baran Karataş, Yiğit Çanga, Gündüz Durmuş, Özge Güzelburç, Furkan Durak, Ayşe Emre

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Ahmet ZenginDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Scienses, Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Mehmet Baran KarataşDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Scienses, Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Yiğit ÇangaDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Scienses, Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Gündüz DurmuşDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Scienses, Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Özge GüzelburçDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Scienses, Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Furkan DurakDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Scienses, Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
Ayşe EmreDepartment of Cardiology, University of Health Scienses, Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital; İstanbul-Turkey.
University of Health Science · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe effect of malnutrition in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not fully understood. In this study, we tried to investigate the prognostic consequence of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score in patients with STEMI.

methodsIn this study, we evaluated the CONUT scores of 1,028 patients with STEMI and examined its relationship with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (all-cause mortality, myocardial reinfarction, and vessel revascularization) during a period of 19.9±10.3 months. Patients with CONUT score ≥5 were defined as severely malnourished. Predictors of MACE were assessed by Cox regression analysis, and p<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

resultsMACE was observed in a total of 147 (14.3%) patients. MACE was more frequent in the group with a higher CONUT score (33.3% vs. 10.9%, p<0.001). CONUT score ≥5 was an independent predictor of MACE in the Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio=2.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.61-3.90, p<0.001). Low ejection fraction, Killip class ≥3 at presentation, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade <3 after intervention, left main artery involvement, and low hemoglobin levels were other independent predictors of MACE in the long-term follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves showed decreased MACE free survival rates in the high CONUT score group at a mean 19.9±10.3 months' follow-up duration (log-rank p<0.01).

conclusionMalnutrition was strongly associated with poor outcomes in patients with STEMI treated using primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionHumansNutritional StatusPrognosisRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35191382
PMCPMC8878938
OpenAlexW4200621571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.