Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191352›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2023

Impact of DHCWs' Safety Perception on Vaccine Acceptance and Adoption of Risk Mitigation Strategies.

M O Coker, G Subramanian, A Davidow, J Fredericks-Younger, M L Gennaro, D H Fine, C A Feldman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Social Justice in Dental Research.JDR clinical and translational research · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M O CokerRutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
G SubramanianRutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
A DavidowRutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
J Fredericks-YoungerRutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
M L GennaroRutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
D H FineRutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
C A FeldmanRutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRN - Administrative CoreU19DE028717 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2019 to 2025
$23.5M
NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE028717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the association between safety perception on vaccine acceptance and adoptions of risk mitigation strategies among dental health care workers (DHCWs).

methodsA survey was emailed to DHCWs in the New Jersey area from December 2020 to January 2021. Perceived safety from regular SARS-CoV-2 testing of self, coworkers, and patients and its association with vaccine hesitancy and risk mitigation were ascertained. Risk Mitigation Strategy (RiMS) scores were computed from groupings of office measures: 1) physical distancing (reduced occupancy, traffic flow, donning of masks, minimal room crowding), 2) personal protective equipment (fitted for N95; donning N95 masks; use of face shields; coverings for head, body, and feet), and 3) environmental disinfection (suction, air filtration, ultraviolet, surface wiping).

resultsSARS-CoV-2 testing of dental professionals, coworkers, and patients were perceived to provide safety at 49%, 55%, and 68%, respectively. While dentists were least likely to feel safe with regular self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 (

conclusionsUnderstanding DHCWs' perception of risk and safety is crucial, as it likely influences attitudes toward testing and implementation of office risk mitigation policies. Clinical studies that correlate risk perception and RiMS with SARS-CoV-2 testing are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of RiMS in dental care settings. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Educators, clinicians, and policy makers can use the results of this study when improving attitudes toward testing and implementation of risk mitigation policies within dental offices, for current and future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 TestingCOVID-19 VaccinesDelivery of Health CareHumansPerceptionCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19dental officesinfection controlPersonal Protective Equipmentsafetyvaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35191352
PMCPMC10029133
OpenAlexW4213264995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.