ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022
Accelerometer-Derived Daily Life Movement Classified by Machine Learning and Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in Older Women: The OPACH Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between physical activity score and incident hypertension among Chinese adults aged 65 years and older: a national prospective cohort study.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of wrist- and thigh-worn accelerometer algorithms using self-training machine learning models for classification of activity type and posture: towards device placement-agnostic methods in the ProPASS consortium.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
- Associations of Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Incident Clinical Osteoporotic Fractures Among Older Women: The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Study.Journal of aging and physical activity · 2026Article
- Substitutions of Sleep, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behaviour and the Risk of Dementia and Stroke.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Association of Accelerometer-Measured Light-Intensity Physical Activity with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Large Cohort Study.Health data science · 2026Article
- Changes in Housework Frequency and Subsequent Cognitive Function and Rate of Decline Among Adults Aged ≥ 65 in the United States, 2008-2018.The Permanente journal · 2025Article
- Current and historic patterns of chronic disease burden are associated with physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults: an observational study.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Associations of Relative Intensity of Physical Activity With Incident Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
- Transforming the cardiometabolic disease landscape: Multimodal AI-powered approaches in prevention and management.Cell metabolism · 2024Review
- Prospective Associations of Accelerometer-Measured Machine-Learned Sedentary Behavior With Death Among Older Women: The OPACH Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Association of Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Incident Cardiovascular Disease, Myocardial Infarction, and Ischemic Stroke: The Women's Health Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background Current physical activity guidelines focus on volume and intensity for CVD prevention rather than common behaviors responsible for movement, including those for daily living activities. We examined the associations of a machine-learned, accelerometer-measured behavior termed daily life movement (DLM) with incident CVD. Methods and Results Older women (n=5416; mean age, 79±7 years; 33% Black, 17% Hispanic) in the Women's Health Initiative OPACH (Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health) study without prior CVD wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers for up to 7 days from May 2012 to April 2014 and were followed for physician-adjudicated incident CVD through February 28th, 2020 (n=616 events). DLM was defined as standing and moving in a confined space such as performing housework or gardening. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI, adjusting for age, race and ethnicity, education, alcohol use, smoking, multimorbidity, self-rated health, and physical function. Restricted cubic splines examined the linearity of the DLM-CVD dose-response association. We examined effect modification by age, body mass index, Reynolds Risk Score, and race and ethnicity. Adjusted HR (95% CIs) across DLM quartiles were: 1.00 (reference), 0.68 (0.55-0.84), 0.70 (0.56-0.87), and 0.57 (0.45-0.74); p-trend<0.001. The HR (95% CI) for each 1-hour increment in DLM was 0.86 (0.80-0.92) with evidence of a linear dose-response association (p non-linear>0.09). There was no evidence of effect modification by age, body mass index, Reynolds Risk Score, or race and ethnicity. Conclusions Higher DLM was independently associated with a lower risk of CVD in older women. Describing the beneficial associations of physical activity in terms of common behaviors could help older adults accumulate physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.