Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191320›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2022

In-Hospital Complications in Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Pensée Wu, Garima V Sharma, Laxmi S Mehta, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Gina P Lundberg, Kara A Nerenberg, Michelle M Graham, Lucy C Chappell, Umesh T Kadam, Kelvin P Jordan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Pensée WuKeele Cardiovascular Research Group School of Medicine Keele University Staffordshire United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0011-5636
Garima V SharmaDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD.ORCID 0000-0001-7254-2077
Laxmi S MehtaDivision of Cardiology Department of Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus OH.ORCID 0000-0003-3493-1930
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine Keele University Staffordshire United Kingdom.
Gina P LundbergDivision of Cardiology MedStar Heart and Vascular InstituteMedStar Washington Hospital CenterGeorgetown University Washington DC.ORCID 0000-0002-8011-7094
Kara A NerenbergDepartments of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Community Health Sciences University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Michelle M GrahamDivision of Cardiology University of Alberta and Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Lucy C ChappellSchool of Life Course Sciences King's College London London United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6219-3379
Umesh T KadamDiabetes Research Centre University of Leicester Leicester United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4433-2977
Kelvin P JordanSchool of Medicine Keele University Staffordshire United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4748-5335
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group School of Medicine Keele University Staffordshire United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-8890
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBJohns Hopkins University · USKeele University · GBKing's College London · GBMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USNational Institute for Health Research · GBThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP‐2014‐05‐019Department of Health TRF‐2017‐10‐005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has emerged as a common treatment option for infertility, a problem that affects an estimated 48 million couples worldwide. Advancing maternal age with increasing prepregnancy cardiovascular risk factors, such as chronic hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, has raised concerns about pregnancy complications associated with ART. However, in-hospital complications following pregnancies conceived by ART are poorly described. Methods and Results To assess the patient characteristics, obstetric outcomes, vascular complications and temporal trends of pregnancies conceived by ART, we analyzed hospital deliveries conceived with or without ART between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016, from the United States National Inpatient Sample database. We included 106 248 deliveries conceived with ART and 34 167 246 deliveries conceived without ART. Women who conceived with ART were older (35 versus 28 years;

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedUnited Statescardiovascular disease risk factorsin vitro fertilizationpregnancyprevention

Identifiers

PMID35191320
PMCPMC9075081
OpenAlexW4213139761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.