Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191215›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2022

Interindividual variability in response to protein and fish oil supplementation in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Caoileann H Murphy, Claire Connolly, Ellen M Flanagan, Kathleen A J Mitchelson, Elena de Marco Castro, Brendan Egan, Lorraine Brennan, Helen M Roche

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caoileann H MurphySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, UCD Conway Institute, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Claire ConnollySchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, UCD Conway Institute, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Ellen M FlanaganSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, UCD Conway Institute, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Kathleen A J MitchelsonSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, UCD Conway Institute, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Elena de Marco CastroSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, UCD Conway Institute, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Brendan EganSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Lorraine BrennanSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, UCD Conway Institute, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.
Helen M RocheSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, UCD Conway Institute, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0628-3318
University College Dublin · IEDublin City University · IE

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine Food Institutional Research Measure Grants entitled NUTRIMAL 'Novel Nutritional Solutions for the Prevention of Malnutrition' 14F822European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) FellowshipEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 666010Joint Programming Initiative Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life (JPI HDHL) EU Food Biomarkers Alliance 'FOODBAll' with Science Foundation Ireland 14/JPHDHL/B3076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecision nutrition is highly topical. However, no studies have explored the interindividual variability in response to nutrition interventions for sarcopenia. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of interindividual variability in response to two nutrition supplementation interventions for sarcopenia and metabolic health, after accounting for sources of variability not attributable to supplementation.

methodsA 24 week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested the impact of leucine-enriched protein (LEU-PRO), LEU-PRO plus long-chain n-3 PUFA (LEU-PRO+n-3) or control (CON) supplementation in older adults (n = 83, 71 ± 6 years) at risk of sarcopenia. To estimate the true interindividual variability in response to supplementation (free of the variability due to measurement error and within-subject variation), the standard deviation of individual responses (SD

resultsThe SD

conclusionsApplying a novel, robust methodological approach to precision nutrition, we show that there was minimal interindividual variability in changes in ALM, muscle function, and TG in response to LEU-PRO and LEU-PRO+n-3 supplementation in older adults at risk of sarcopenia.

Indexed as

Fish OilsSarcopeniaAgedDietary SupplementsHumansLeucineMuscle, SkeletalFish OilsLeucineFish oilInterindividual variabilityLeucinePersonalized nutritionProteinSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID35191215
PMCPMC8977999
OpenAlexW4213327816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.