Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191080›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2022

Exploring rural doctors' early experiences of coping with the emerging COVID-19 pandemic.

Ian Couper, Lucie Walters, Susan Williams, David Campbell, Isabella White, Ruth Stewart, Jill Konkin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring rural doctors' early experiences of coping with the emerging COVID-19 pandemic.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ian CouperUkwanda Centre for Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-6075
Lucie WaltersAdelaide Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1322-1895
Susan WilliamsAdelaide Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7721-4152
David CampbellAustralian College of Rural and Remote Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2886-732X
Isabella WhiteAdelaide Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ruth StewartCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Jill KonkinDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7266-4282
The University of Adelaide · AUAustralian College of Rural and Remote Medicine · AUJames Cook University · AUUniversity of Alberta · CAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo understand how rural doctors (physicians) responded to the emerging COVID-19 pandemic and their strategies for coping.

methodsEarly in the pandemic doctors (physicians) who practise rural and remote medicine were invited to participate through existing rural doctors' networks. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural doctors from 11 countries. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using NVivo. A thematic analysis was used to identify common ideas and narratives.

findingsParticipants' accounts described highly adaptable and resourceful responses to address the crisis. Rapid changes to organizational and clinical practices were implemented, at a time of uncertainty, anxiety, and fear, and with limited information and resources. Strong relationships and commitment to their colleagues and communities were integral to shaping and sustaining these doctors' responses. We identified five common themes underpinning rural doctors' shared experiences: (1) caring for patients in a context of uncertainty, fear, and anxiety; (2) practical solutions through improvising and being resourceful; (3) gaining community trust and cooperation; (4) adapting to unrelenting pressures; and (5) reaffirming commitments. These themes are discussed in relation to the Lazarus and Folkman stress and coping model.

conclusionsWith limited resources and support, these rural doctors' practical responses to the COVID-19 crisis underscore strong problem-focused coping strategies and shared commitments to their communities, patients, and colleagues. They drew support from sharing experiences with peers (emotion-focused coping) and finding positive meanings in their experiences (meaning-based coping). The psychosocial impact on rural doctors working at the limits of their adaptive resources is an ongoing concern.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPandemicsRural Populationcoping strategiesCOVID-19 pandemicrural physicians

Identifiers

PMID35191080
PMCPMC9115214
OpenAlexW4212895525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.