Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191017›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Shoshana M Rosenberg, Jennifer M Gierisch, Anna C Revette, Carol L Lowenstein, Elizabeth S Frank, Deborah E Collyar, Thomas Lynch, Alastair M Thompson, Ann H Partridge, E Shelley Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Impact of Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth training for rural cancer survivors on health care utilization and economic outcomes in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk perception of patients with ductal carcinomaHistology and histopathology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Countercurrents: DCIS or Cancer? Why All the Confusion?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shoshana M RosenbergDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0074-6385
Jennifer M GierischDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Anna C RevetteSurvey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carol L LowensteinSurvey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth S FrankDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deborah E CollyarPatient Advocates in Research, Danville, California.
Thomas LynchDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Alastair M ThompsonDan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Ann H PartridgeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4722-4824
E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Improving surgical decision-making in young women with breast cancerK01HS023680 · AHRQ · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ROSENBERG, SHOSHANA M · 2015 to 2019
$594k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS023680Breast Cancer Research Foundation BCRF17-121Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation CIN 13-410NCI NIH HHS L30 CA179751Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute PCS-1505-30497Susan G. Komen SAC1000008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOf the nearly 50,000 women in the United States who undergo treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) annually, many may not benefit from treatment. To better understand the impact of a DCIS diagnosis, patients self-identified as having had DCIS were engaged regarding their experience.

methodsIn July 2014, a web-based survey was administered through the Susan Love Army of Women breast cancer listserv. The survey included open-ended questions designed to assess patients' perspectives about DCIS diagnosis and treatment. Deductive and inductive codes were applied to the responses; common themes were summarized.

resultsAmong the 1832 women included in the analytic sample, the median age at diagnosis was 60 years. Four primary themes were identified: 1) uncertainty surrounding a DCIS diagnosis, 2) uncertainty about DCIS treatment, 3) concern about treatment side effects, and 4) concern about recurrence and/or developing invasive breast cancer. When diagnosed, participants were often uncertain about whether they had cancer or not and whether they should be considered a "survivor." Uncertainty about treatment manifested as questioning the appropriateness of the amount of treatment received. Participants expressed concern about the "cancer spreading" or becoming invasive and that they were not necessarily "doing enough" to prevent recurrence.

conclusionsIn a large, national sample, participants with a history of DCIS reported confusion and concern about the diagnosis and treatment, which caused worry and significant uncertainty. Developing strategies to improve patient and provider communications regarding the nature of DCIS and acknowledging gaps in the current knowledge of management options should be a priority.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCommunicationFemaleHumansSurvivorsUncertaintyUnited Statesductal carcinoma in situknowledgepatient-centeredqualitativestakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID35191017
PMCPMC9274613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.