Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35191010›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2022

Employment, Work Productivity, and Biologic Treatments in Self-Reported Axial Spondyloarthritis: a Cross-Sectional Study in a Female Predominant Population from the ArthritisPower Registry.

Kelly Gavigan, W Benjamin Nowell, Theresa Hunter, Jeffrey R Curtis, William N Malatestinic, Rebecca J Bolce, Jeffrey R Lisse, Jessica Walsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of PROMIS measures in clinical studies in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly GaviganGlobal Healthy Living Foundation, 515 N Midland Ave, Upper Nyack, NY, 10960, USA. kgavigan@ghlf.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2615-4940
W Benjamin NowellGlobal Healthy Living Foundation, 515 N Midland Ave, Upper Nyack, NY, 10960, USA.
Theresa HunterEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jeffrey R CurtisUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
William N MalatestinicEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Rebecca J BolceEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jeffrey R LisseEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jessica WalshUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USGlobal Healthy Living Foundation · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to characterize employment, work productivity, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment in a predominantly female population of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients in a real-world setting.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of axSpA participants within the ArthritisPower registry. Outcomes were assessed with surveys (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI], Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments) and compared between subgroups (employed vs. not employed; taking vs. not taking a bDMARD).

resultsAmong the 195 participants, 117 (60.0%) were employed and 78 (40.0%) were not employed entirely or partially due to axSpA. The mean age of the participants was 47.6 years and 86.7% were female. Current bDMARD use was reported by 57.4% of those surveyed (59.8% employed vs. 53.9% not employed; p = 0.408). Compared to not employed participants, employed participants had more favorable disease activity (BASDAI 6.0 vs. 7.6; p < 0.001) and overall health (self-rated health 2.5 vs. 1.8; p < 0.001). Employed participants, compared to not employed participants, were diagnosed at an earlier age (36.0 vs. 42.5 years, respectively) and experienced a shorter time between symptom onset and diagnosis (9.5 vs. 13.6 years, respectively). Employed participants reported missing on average 6.5 days of work and experienced a 52.7% impairment on work productivity due to axSpA over a 3-month period. Absenteeism and presenteeism were statistically similar between participants taking a bDMARD versus those not taking a bDMARD.

conclusionsAlthough bDMARD treatment rates were similar between employed and not employed participants, disease activity and overall health were better in employed than non-employed participants. Employed participants experienced substantial work productivity impairment due to axSpA.

Indexed as

Ankylosing spondylitisAxial spondyloarthritisEmploymentFemale populationWork productivity

Identifiers

PMID35191010
PMCPMC8964841
OpenAlexW4212785387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.