ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Two wrongs sometimes do make a right: errors in aortic valve stenosis assessment by same-day Doppler echocardiography and 4D flow MRI.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of 4D Flow MRI-Derived Aortic Hemodynamics and Their Relationships With Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis: A Preliminary Study.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to systematically verify if the simplified geometry and flow profile of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) assumed in 2D echocardiography is appropriate while examining the utility of 4D flow MRI to assess valvular disease. This prospective study obtained same-day Doppler echocardiography and 4D flow MRI in 37 healthy volunteers (age: 51.9 ± 18.2, 20 females) and 7 aortic stenosis (AS) patients (age: 64.2 ± 9.6, 1 female). Two critical assumptions made in echocardiography for aortic valve area assessment were examined, i.e. the assumption of (1) a circular LVOT shape and (2) a flat velocity profile through the LVOT. 3D velocity and shape information obtained with 4D flow MRI was used as comparison. It was found that the LVOT area was lower (by 26.5% and 24.5%) and the velocity time integral (VTI) was higher (by 28.5% and 30.2%) with echo in the healthy and AS group, respectively. These competing errors largely cancelled out when examining individual and cohort averaged LVOT stroke volume. The LVOT area, VTI and stroke volume measured by echo and 4D flow MRI were 3.6 ± 0.7 vs. 4.9 ± 1.0 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.