Observational studyPediatric cardiology2022
Screening and Evaluation of Neurodevelopmental Impairments in Infants Under 6 Months of Age with Congenital Heart Disease.
Observational study in Pediatric cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causal inference between neurodevelopmental disorders and brain structure among individuals with congenital heart disease: Insights from meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Concurrent Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability of the Motor Optimality Score-Revised in a Neonatal Surgical Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Research progress on neurodevelopmental disorders associated with congenital heart disease].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024Review
- Developmental care pathway for hospitalised infants with CHD: on behalf of the Cardiac Newborn Neuroprotective Network, a Special Interest Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative.Cardiology in the young · 2023Article
- Inter-Rater Reliability of the Polish Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in Children with Heart Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical evaluation of neurodevelopmental impairments before 6 months of age is needed in congenital heart disease (CHD) to promote early referral to developmental interventions. The objective was to identify the risk of cerebral palsy (CP) and to compare neurodevelopment outcomes in infants with and without CHD. In a longitudinal study, 30 infants with CHD and 15 infants without CHD were assessed at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months of age. Included measures were General Movement Assessment (GMA), Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) and the Bayley Scale of Infant Development, third edition (Bayley-III), selected to identify the risk of CP, document neurodevelopmental impairments and infants' eligibility for early intervention services. Abnormal GMA categories were found in the CHD group where 48% had poor repertoire and 15% were at high risk of CP. At 3 months of age, CHD group had significantly lower TIMP scores compared to infants without CHD [t(41) = 6.57, p = 0.01]. All infants in the study had higher Bayley-III scores at 6 months than at 3 months of age. Infants with CHD had lower gross motor, fine motor and cognitive Bayley-III scores compared to their peers without CHD. Over time infants without CHD outperformed the CHD group in the gross motor skills [F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.