Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190864›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Sex differences in cognitive-motor components of braking in older adults.

Agostina Casamento-Moran, Prakruti Patel, Victoria Zablocki, Evangelos A Christou, Neha Lodha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Minimum perceptual time (MPT). Repeatability and reproducibility of variables applied to "sports vision".Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agostina Casamento-MoranDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Prakruti PatelDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Movement Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Victoria ZablockiDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Movement Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Evangelos A ChristouDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Neha LodhaDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Movement Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. neha.lodha@colostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-515X
Colorado State University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

American Heart Association 14SDG20450151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast and accurate braking is essential for safe driving and relies on efficient cognitive and motor processes. Despite the known sex differences in overall driving behavior, it is unclear whether sex differences exist in the objective assessment of driving-related tasks in older adults. Furthermore, it is unknown whether cognitive-motor processes are differentially affected in men and women with advancing age. We aimed to determine sex differences in the cognitive-motor components of the braking performance in older adults. Fourteen men (63.06 ± 8.53 years) and 14 women (67.89 ± 11.81 years) performed a braking task in a simulated driving environment. Participants followed a lead car and applied a quick and controlled braking force in response to the rear lights of the lead car. We quantified braking accuracy and response time. Importantly, we also decomposed response time in its cognitive (pre-motor response time) and motor (motor response time) components. Lastly, we examined whether sex differences in the activation and coordination of the involved muscles could explain differences in performance. We found sex differences in the cognitive-motor components of braking performance with advancing age. Specifically, the cognitive processing speed is 27.41% slower in women, while the motor execution speed is 24.31% slower in men during the braking task. The opposite directions of impairment in the cognitive and motor speeds contributed to comparable overall braking speed across sexes. The sex differences in the activation of the involved muscles did not relate to response time differences between men and women. The exponential increase in the number of older drivers raises concerns about potential effects on traffic and driver safety. We demonstrate the presence of sex differences in the cognitive-motor components of braking performance with advancing age. Driving rehabilitation should consider differential strategies for ameliorating sex-specific deficits in cognitive and motor speeds to enhance braking performance in older adults.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingSex CharacteristicsAgedCognitionFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeBraking accuracyBraking response timeCar drivingMovement speedProcessing speed

Identifiers

PMID35190864
OpenAlexW4213166200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.