ReviewDer Orthopade2022
[Update on imaging in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProperly performed high-quality imaging is critical in the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Currently, conventional imaging in the form of an anteroposterior view of the pelvis and at least a second view is still the first step in the diagnosis of FAIS. Here, by determining the various parameters, the acetabular configuration should also be accurately assessed with regard to a combination with dysplasia or acetabular retroversion. MRI: MRI should also be demanded as standard before joint-preserving surgery. It allows for more precise detection of morphology, secondary chondrolabral damage, and thus helps identify outcome-relevant risk factors and cases that are too advanced in terms of degenerative aspects. OTHER IMAGING
methodsDepending on the problem, MRI can be supplemented by intravenous or intra-articular application of contrast agents (indirect or direct MRA), determination of torsion, and, if necessary, even with the performance of a traction MRA. While the importance of invasive MRA has decreased due to the improvements of 3‑Tesla scanners in clinical practice, rotational analysis has gained in importance. Computed tomography (CT), although associated with increased radiation exposure, allows high-resolution imaging of bony structures and extremely illustrative 3D planning of complex corrections, and is an alternative to MRI for this purpose or in contraindications. PROSPECTS: 4D simulations appear useful and may make diagnostics and therapy planning safer and easier in the future. Thus, a broad portfolio of imaging techniques is available today, the advances of which have contributed significantly to the development of differentiated joint-preserving surgery of the hip joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.