Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190784›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Differences in the composition and predicted functions of the intestinal microbiome of obese and normal weight adult dogs.

Pamela Thomson, Rodrigo Santibáñez, Camila Rodríguez-Salas, Carla Flores-Yañez, Daniel Garrido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Understanding the diversity and roles of the canine gut microbiome.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Translational animal science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela ThomsonEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello., Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo SantibáñezChemical and Bioprocess Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Camila Rodríguez-SalasEscuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Nacional Andrés Bello., Santiago, Chile.
Carla Flores-YañezClínica Veterinaria Los Avellanos, Santiago, Chile.
Daniel GarridoChemical and Bioprocess Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversidad Andrés Bello · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a multifactorial nutritional disorder highly prevalent in dogs, observed in developed and developing countries. It is estimated that over 40% of the canine population suffers from obesity, which manifests in an increased risk of chronic osteoarticular, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases. The intestinal microbiome of obese animals shows increases in the abundance of certain members capable of extracting energy from complex polysaccharides. The objective of this study was to compare the composition and predicted function of the intestinal microbiome of Chilean obese and normal weight adult dogs. Twenty clinically healthy dogs were classified according to their body condition score (BCS) as obese (

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsDogsFecesObesityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCaninesGut microbiomeMicrobiome functionObesity

Identifiers

PMID35190784
PMCPMC8857902
OpenAlexW4212973178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.