Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190763›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Analysis of Sepsis Markers and Pathogenesis Based on Gene Differential Expression and Protein Interaction Network.

Jifang Liang, Weidong Wu, Xiuzhe Wang, Wenjing Wu, Shuxian Chen, Meini Jiang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jifang LiangDepartment of Critical Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital (Tongji Shanxi Hospital of Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences), The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 030031 Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Weidong WuDepartment of Critical Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital (Tongji Shanxi Hospital of Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences), The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 030031 Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Xiuzhe WangDepartment of Critical Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital (Tongji Shanxi Hospital of Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences), The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 030031 Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Wenjing WuDepartment of Critical Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital (Tongji Shanxi Hospital of Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences), The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 030031 Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Shuxian ChenDepartment of Critical Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital (Tongji Shanxi Hospital of Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences), The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 030031 Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Meini JiangDepartment of Critical Medicine, Shanxi Bethune Hospital (Tongji Shanxi Hospital of Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences), The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, 030031 Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7898-3858
Shanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of the present study is to screen the hub genes associated with sepsis, comprehensively understand the occurrence and progress mechanism of sepsis, and provide new targets for clinical diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.

methodsThe microarray data of GSE9692 and GSE95233 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The dataset GSE9692 contained 29 children with sepsis and 16 healthy children, while the dataset GSE95233 included 102 septic subjects and 22 healthy volunteers. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened by GEO2R online analysis. The DAVID database was applied to conduct functional enrichment analysis of the DEGs. The STRING database was adopted to acquire protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks.

resultsWe identified 286 DEGs (217 upregulated DEGs and 69 downregulated DEGs) in the dataset GSE9692 and 357 DEGs (236 upregulated DEGs and 121 downregulated DEGs) in the dataset GSE95233. After the intersection of DEGs of the two datasets, a total of 98 co-DEGs were obtained. DEGs associated with sepsis were involved in inflammatory responses such as T cell activation, leukocyte cell-cell adhesion, leukocyte-mediated immunity, cytokine production, immune effector process, lymphocyte-mediated immunity, defense response to fungus, and lymphocyte-mediated immunity. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis suggested that sepsis was connected to bacterial and viral infections. Through PPI network analysis, we screened the most important hub genes, including ITK, CD247, MMP9, CD3D, MMP8, KLRK1, and GZMK.

conclusionsIn conclusion, the present study revealed an unbalanced immune response at the transcriptome level of sepsis and identified genes for potential biomarkers of sepsis, such as ITK, CD247, MMP9, CD3D, MMP8, KLRK1, and GZMK.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsSepsisBiomarkersChildComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 8Matrix Metalloproteinase 9BiomarkersMatrix Metalloproteinase 8Matrix Metalloproteinase 9

Identifiers

PMID35190763
PMCPMC8858053
OpenAlexW4213085908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.