Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190645›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Propensity score analysis of psychological intimate partner violence and preterm birth.

Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras, Khalid Saeed Khan, Casilda Velasco, Africa Caño, Juan de Dios Luna, Leticia Rubio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stella Martín-de-Las-HerasDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 32, 29017, Málaga, Spain. smdelasheras@uma.es.
Khalid Saeed KhanDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Casilda VelascoDepartment of Midwifery, University of Jaen, Jaén, Spain.
Africa CañoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Juan de Dios LunaDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Leticia RubioDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 32, 29017, Málaga, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESUniversidad de Jaén · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological intimate partner violence (IPV), a global public health problem, affects mothers during pregnancy. We evaluated its relationship with preterm birth. We established a cohort of 779 consecutive mothers receiving antenatal care and giving birth in 15 public hospitals in Spain. Trained midwives collected IPV data using the Index of Spouse Abuse validated in the Spanish language. Preterm was defined as birth before 37 completed weeks of gestation. Gestational age was estimated by early ultrasound. With multivariate logistic regression we estimated the relative association of IPV with preterm birth as adjusted odds ratios (AOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In propensity score analysis, using weighting by inverse probability of exposure to IPV, the whole sample was used for estimating the absolute difference in probability of preterm amongst offspring born to mothers with and without IPV. Socio-demographic and other pregnancy characteristics served as covariates in both analyses. Preterm occurred in 57 (7.3%) pregnancies. Psychological IPV, experienced by 151 (21%) mothers, was associated with preterm birth (11.9% vs 6.5%; AOR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.1-5.0; p = 0.01). The absolute preterm difference in psychological IPV compared to normal was 0.08 (95% CI = 0.01-0.16; p = 0.04). The probability of preterm birth was 8% higher on average in women with psychological IPV during pregnancy. As our analysis controlled for selection bias, our findings give credence to a causal inference. Screening and management for psychological IPV during pregnancy is an important step in antenatal care to prevent preterm birth.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntimate Partner ViolencePregnancyPremature BirthPrenatal CareSpain

Identifiers

PMID35190645
PMCPMC8861009
OpenAlexW4213313998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.