Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190608›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

InCASEOf scoring system for distinction between pachychoroid-associated macular neovascularization and neovascular age-related macular degeneration in patients older than 50 years.

Grazia M Cozzupoli, Enrico Borrelli, Vittorio Capuano, Riccardo Sacconi, Polina Astroz, Marco Battista, Francesco Bandello, Eric Souied, Giuseppe Querques

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The spectrum of pachychoroid neovasculopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Grazia M CozzupoliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Enrico BorrelliSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Vittorio CapuanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Riccardo SacconiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Polina AstrozDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Marco BattistaSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BandelloSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Eric SouiedDepartment of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Giuseppe QuerquesSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. giuseppe.querques@hotmail.it.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITHôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop a novel scoring system aiming at guiding the differential diagnosis between macular neovascularization secondary to pachychoroid disease (pMNV) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in patients aged 50 years and older. In this retrospective study performed at University Vita-Salute San Raffaele (Milan, Italy) and Créteil University Eye Clinic (Créteil, France), we enrolled patients 50 years of age and older, visited between January 2017 and January 2019, who were diagnosed with either treatment-naïve pMNV or neovascular AMD. At the time of diagnosis, all patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography angiography. Univariate comparison between pMNV and neovascular AMD groups was performed to identify the main clinical predictors for pMNV. The selected predictors were taken into a binomial logistic regression and eventually served as the basis for the development of InCASEOf scoring system. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to study the model performance. Forty-eight right eyes from 48 patients with pMNV and 39 right eyes from 39 patients with neovascular AMD were considered in this study. Age (+ 2 points), sex (+ 2 points), choroidal thickness (+ 2 points), early pachyvessels (+ 2 points), and evidence of MNV at OCTA (+ 3 points) turned out to be predictors for pMNV. Four additional factors significant at univariate analysis were considered: type 2 and type 3 MNVs and presence of intraretinal fluid (- 0.5 points each), and presence of subretinal fluid (+ 0.5 points). InCASEOf scoring system was built with a high score of 11.5 points. The cutoff value of 6.5 showed good accuracy in separating pMNVs from neovascular AMDs. InCASEOf is a straightforward clinical scoring system, accessible to comprehensive ophthalmologists, with the purpose of enabling easy distinction and expert-like diagnosis of pMNV and neovascular AMD in patients aged 50 years or older.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalResearch DesignAgedAge FactorsAngiographyChoroidal NeovascularizationDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansIndocyanine GreenMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveIndocyanine Green

Identifiers

PMID35190608
PMCPMC8861109
OpenAlexW4213251422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.