Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190596›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria.

Tala Andoni, Jennifer Wiggins, Rachel Robinson, Ruth Charlton, Michael Sandberg, Rosalind Eeles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Editorial Commentary.Urology practice · 2023
    Article
  8. Who Should Have Multigene Germline Testing for Hereditary Cancer?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Providing Evidence of Predisposition Genes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tala AndoniThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. talaandoni@gmail.com.
Jennifer WigginsRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Rachel RobinsonLeeds Genetics Laboratory, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Ruth CharltonLeeds Genetics Laboratory, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Michael Sandberg90 Sloane Street, London, UK.
Rosalind EelesThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing for cancer predisposition has been curtailed by the cost of sequencing, and testing has been restricted by eligibility criteria. As the cost of sequencing decreases, the question of expanding multi-gene cancer panels to a broader population arises. We evaluated how many additional actionable genetic variants are returned by unrestricted panel testing in the private sector compared to those which would be returned by adhering to current NHS eligibility criteria. We reviewed 152 patients referred for multi-gene cancer panels in the private sector between 2014 and 2016. Genetic counselling and disclosure of all results was standard of care provided by the Consultant. Every panel conducted was compared to current eligibility criteria. A germline pathogenic / likely pathogenic variant (P/LP), in a gene relevant to the personal or family history of cancer, was detected in 15 patients (detection rate of 10%). 46.7% of those found to have the P/LP variants (7 of 15), or 4.6% of the entire set (7 of 152), did not fulfil NHS eligibility criteria. 46.7% of P/LP variants in this study would have been missed by national testing guidelines, all of which were actionable. However, patients who do not fulfil eligibility criteria have a higher Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) burden. We demonstrated that the current England NHS threshold for genetic testing is missing pathogenic variants which would alter management in 4.6%, nearly 1 in 20 individuals. However, the clinical service burden that would ensue is a detection of VUS of 34%.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorEnglandFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID35190596
PMCPMC8861039
OpenAlexW4213073034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.