Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190592›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Heat inactivation of clinical COVID-19 samples on an industrial scale for low risk and efficient high-throughput qRT-PCR diagnostic testing.

Oona Delpuech, Julie A Douthwaite, Thomas Hill, Dhevahi Niranjan, Nancy T Malintan, Hannah Duvoisin, Jane Elliott, Ian Goodfellow, Myra Hosmillo, Alexandra L Orton and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Oona Delpuech *Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Julie A Douthwaite *Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. Julie.douthwaite@astrazeneca.com.
Thomas HillCharles River Laboratories, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden, CB10 1XL, UK.
Dhevahi NiranjanDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Nancy T MalintanDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Hannah DuvoisinDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Jane ElliottDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Ian GoodfellowDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Myra HosmilloDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Alexandra L OrtonDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Molly A TaylorDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Christopher BrankinBiologics Engineering, Research and Early Development, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Haidee PittDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Douglas Ross-ThrieplandDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Magdalena SiekDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Anna CuthbertDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Ian RichardsCharles River Laboratories, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden, CB10 1XL, UK.
John R FerdinandCharles River Laboratories, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden, CB10 1XL, UK.
Colin BarkerBiologIC Technologies Ltd., Soham, UK.
Robert ShawOral Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology and Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK.
Cristina ArianiWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Ian WaddellCharles River Laboratories, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden, CB10 1XL, UK.
Steve ReesDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Clive GreenDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Roger ClarkCharles River Laboratories, Chesterford Research Park, Saffron Walden, CB10 1XL, UK.
Abhishek UpadhyayBioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Rob HowesDiscovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBCharles River Laboratories (United Kingdom) · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBAstraZeneca (Singapore) · SGAstraZeneca (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Cambridge · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097997/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 097997/Z/11/Z and 207498/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 207498/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the development of a large scale process for heat inactivation of clinical COVID-19 samples prior to laboratory processing for detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR. With more than 266 million confirmed cases, over 5.26 million deaths already recorded at the time of writing, COVID-19 continues to spread in many parts of the world. Consequently, mass testing for SARS-CoV-2 will remain at the forefront of the COVID-19 response and prevention for the near future. Due to biosafety considerations the standard testing process requires a significant amount of manual handling of patient samples within calibrated microbiological safety cabinets. This makes the process expensive, effects operator ergonomics and restricts testing to higher containment level laboratories. We have successfully modified the process by using industrial catering ovens for bulk heat inactivation of oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab samples within their secondary containment packaging before processing in the lab to enable all subsequent activities to be performed in the open laboratory. As part of a validation process, we tested greater than 1200 clinical COVID-19 samples and showed less than 1 Cq loss in RT-qPCR test sensitivity. We also demonstrate the bulk heat inactivation protocol inactivates a murine surrogate of human SARS-CoV-2. Using bulk heat inactivation, the assay is no longer reliant on containment level 2 facilities and practices, which reduces cost, improves operator safety and ergonomics and makes the process scalable. In addition, heating as the sole method of virus inactivation is ideally suited to streamlined and more rapid workflows such as 'direct to PCR' assays that do not involve RNA extraction or chemical neutralisation methods.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureVirus InactivationAnimalsCell LineContainment of BiohazardsCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingHumansMiceMurine hepatitis virusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID35190592
PMCPMC8861189
OpenAlexW4220667391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.