ArticleBMJ open2022
Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into shared decision-making in the management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04805554 (Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Shared Decision Making With Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Shared Decision Making With Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Real-World Performance Measurement of Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support Tools: Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Pooled it
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Application of the theory of planned behavior in self-care behaviors of knee osteoarthritis in the rural older people.BMC geriatrics · 2025Trial
- Patient-reported outcomes as markers and predictors of functional recovery in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Shared decision-making and patient decision aids in knee osteoarthritis: a scoping review.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Implementation of clinical decision support tools for treatment selection in knee osteoarthritis: a scoping review.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- Implementation Science in Breast Reconstruction: A Guide to Closing the Research-to-practice Gap.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Coaching Patients to Understand and Use Patient-Reported Outcome Data: Intervention Design and Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Satisfied with the worst health outcomes or unsatisfied with the best: explaining the divergence between good patient-reported outcomes and low satisfaction and vice versa among knee arthroplasty patients - a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Assessing the Association of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Patient-Reported Outcomes on Shared Decision-Making among Multimorbid Individuals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Shared decision-making in patients with multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOsteoarthritis (OA) is a major clinical and public health concern. The primary surgical treatment of knee OA is total knee replacement (TKR), a procedure that aims to alleviate pain and restore physical function. TKR is expensive, however, and based on professional guidelines, inappropriately performed in up to a third of patients. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) help evaluate treatment options by quantifying health outcomes that matter to patients and can thus inform shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and health professionals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a US-based 2-year, two-site hybrid type 1 study to assess clinical effectiveness and implementation of a machine learning-based patient decision aid (PDA) integrating patient-reported outcomes and clinical variables to support SDM for patients with knee OA considering TKR. Substudy 1: At one study site, a randomised controlled trial is evaluating the clinical effectiveness of the PDA and SDM process on decision quality as measured after the baseline consultation and treatment choice measured 3 and 6 months after the baseline visit among 200 patients with knee OA. Substudy 2: At a second study site, a qualitative assessment using principles of behaviour design and intervention mapping is evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the PROMs, PDA and SDM process by interviewing seven health professionals and 25 patients before and 25 patients after PDA implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from The University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board (protocol number: 2018-11-0042). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study results will be disseminated through conference presentations, publications and professional societies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04805554.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.