Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190277›Full record

ArticleFoot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons2022

The use of three-dimensional biometric Foot and Ankle Offset to predict additional realignment procedures in total ankle replacement.

Cesar de Cesar Netto, Jonathan Day, Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos, Andrew Roney, Nacime S Barbachan Mansur, Francois Lintz, Scott J Ellis, Constantine A Demetracopoulos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Weight-Bearing CT for Diseases around the Ankle Joint.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cesar de Cesar NettoUniversity of Iowa, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: Cesar-netto@uiowa.edu.
Jonathan DayGeorgetown University, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Washington, DC, USA.
Alexandre Leme Godoy-SantosUniversity of Sao Paulo, Department of Orthopaedics, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Andrew RoneyHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nacime S Barbachan MansurUniversity of Iowa, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Francois LintzClinique De L'Union, Toulouse, France.
Scott J EllisHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Constantine A DemetracopoulosHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Hospital for Special Surgery · USUniversity of Iowa · USGeorgetown University · USHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecision to perform associated corrective alignment procedures in patients undergoing total ankle replacement (TAR) is commonly made intraoperatively. The Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) can evaluate multiplanar deformity and be an effective instrument in surgical planning. This study objective was to assess the ability of this tool to predict the need for additional realignment procedures at the time of TAR.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we enrolled 21 patients who underwent TAR and had preoperative WBCT studies. Two independent and blinded observers calculated the preoperative FAO using dedicated software. FAO measurements were compared between the different alignment groups (physiological alignment, valgus and varus). A multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between performed realignment procedures and FAO values.

resultsMean preoperative FAO was 4.4% (95%CI = 1.4-7.5). The number of osseous realignment procedures needed was found to correlate positively and significantly with FAO (p = .001). The number of osseus procedures needed was significantly higher in patients with valgus malalignment (p = .009). Patients with valgus malalignment needing a medial column procedure had a relative risk of 6.3 when compared to varus malalignment patients (p = .02).

conclusionThe number of additional bony realignment procedures performed at the time of TAR significantly correlated with preoperative FAO and that the number of osseus procedures needed was significantly higher in patients with valgus malalignment. Such biometric tools may enhance the preoperative assessment and surgical planning for patients undergoing TAR, with the potential to optimize surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, AnkleAnkleAnkle JointBiometryHumansMineralsRetrospective StudiesMineralsOsseus3D biometricsFAOFoot and Ankle OffsetMalalignmentTARTotal ankle replacement

Identifiers

PMID35190277
OpenAlexW4212884912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.