Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190253›Full record

ArticleReproductive biomedicine online2022

The impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on fertility patients and clinics around the world.

Elizabeth Cutting, Sally Catt, Beverley Vollenhoven, Ben W Mol, Fabrizzio Horta

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biomedicine online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth CuttingEducation Program in Reproduction and Development (EPRD), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: Elizabeth.cutting@monash.edu.
Sally CattEducation Program in Reproduction and Development (EPRD), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia.
Beverley VollenhovenEducation Program in Reproduction and Development (EPRD), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia; Womens and Newborn Program Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia; Monash IVF, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia.
Ben W MolEducation Program in Reproduction and Development (EPRD), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia; Womens and Newborn Program Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia.
Fabrizzio HortaEducation Program in Reproduction and Development (EPRD), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia; Monash IVF, Clayton, Melbourne Victoria, Australia.
Monash Health · AUMonash University · AUMonash IVF · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionWhat is the impact of the response to COVID-19 on the management of fertility treatments and clinical practice around the world?

designFertility clinic associates around the world were approached. They completed an online survey containing 33 questions focused on the country's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Known fertility clinic associates that were contacted comprised scientific directors, medical directors and laboratory managers.

resultsThere were 43 individual country responses from Asia (13), Africa (3), Europe (17), North America (3), Oceania (2) and South America (5). In nine countries, clinics followed their government body recommendations, in 22 countries there was a combination of recommendations, in 3 countries changes were made by clinic initiative, and 9 countries did not specify. In 34 countries IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and frozen embryo transfer (FET) treatments had an average delay of 56 days (IVF/ICSI) (minimum 0, maximum 160) and 57 days (FET) (minimum 0, maximum 166 days). During the shutdown, the number of freeze-all cycles increased in 22 countries. Only 23 countries reported patients having to undergo a SARS-CoV-2 test, and 20 countries did not report any COVID-19 testing in their clinic. Additional support counselling was offered in 28 countries, partner restrictions at clinics were reported in 41 countries and time between patients' appointments was increased in 39 countries.

conclusionsThe implications of COVID-19 mitigation measures proved the need for government societies to introduce a set protocol that includes requirements such as increased patient counselling and additional guidelines for prioritizing couples who need care most urgently.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsReproductive Techniques, AssistedSARS-CoV-2Assisted reproductive technologyCOVID-19GlobalInfertility servicesPatient care

Identifiers

PMID35190253
PMCPMC8712431
OpenAlexW4200512747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.