Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190252›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2022

The Cost-Effectiveness of Remdesivir for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

Melanie D Whittington, Steven D Pearson, David M Rind, Jonathan D Campbell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Management of patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A real-world economic evaluation from the hospital perspective.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. An evaluation of vilobelimab (anti-C5a) as a cost-effective option to treat severely ill mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19-related health utility values and changes in COVID-19 patients and the general population: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  12. Evidence of quality of life for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a scoping review.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Impact of Funding Inpatient Treatments for COVID-19 on Health Equity in the United States: A Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023
    Article
  20. Cost-Effectiveness of Remdesivir for COVID-19 Treatment: What Are We Missing?Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie D WhittingtonInstitute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mwhittington@icer.org.
Steven D PearsonInstitute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA.
David M RindInstitute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan D CampbellInstitute for Clinical and Economic Review, Boston, MA, USA.
Institute for Clinical and Economic Review · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir, the first novel therapeutic to receive Emergency Use Authorization for the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and identify key drivers of value to guide future pricing and reimbursement efforts.

methodsA Markov model evaluated the cost-effectiveness of remdesivir in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from a US healthcare sector perspective. A lifetime time horizon captured potential long-term costs and outcomes. Model outcomes included discounted total costs, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Remdesivir was modeled as an addition to standard of care and compared with standard of care alone, including dexamethasone for patients requiring respiratory support. COVID-19 hospitalizations were assumed to be reimbursed through a single payment based on the respiratory support received alongside a remdesivir carveout payment in the base case. Sensitivity and scenario analyses identified key drivers.

resultsAt a unit price of $520 per vial and assuming no survival benefit with remdesivir, the incremental cost-effectiveness was $298 200/QALY for patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 and $1 847 000/QALY for patients with mild COVID-19. Although current data do not support a survival benefit, if one was assumed, the cost-effectiveness estimate was $50 100/QALY for the moderate to severe population and $103 400/QALY for the mild population. Another key driver included the hospitalization payment structure (per diem vs bundled payment).

conclusionsWith the current evidence available, remdesivir's price is too high to align with its expected health gains for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Results from this study provide a rationale for iterative health technology assessment.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineremdesivircost-effectivenessCOVID-19remdesivirvalue assessment

Identifiers

PMID35190252
PMCPMC8856900
OpenAlexW4213206596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.