Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35190077›Full record

ArticleJournal of school psychology2022

Determining stakeholder priorities and core components for school-based identification of mental health difficulties: A Delphi study.

Emma Soneson, Anne-Marie Burn, Joanna K Anderson, Ayla Humphrey, Peter B Jones, Mina Fazel, Tamsin Ford, Emma Howarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of school psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Mood Monitoring in Schools: A Promising Alternative to Single-Time-Point Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma SonesonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: es703@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Anne-Marie BurnDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, University of Cambridge, UK.
Joanna K AndersonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, University of Cambridge, UK.
Ayla HumphreyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, University of Cambridge, UK.
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, University of Cambridge, UK.
Mina FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, UK.
Tamsin FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England, University of Cambridge, UK.
Emma HowarthSchool of Psychology, University of East London, Stratford Campus, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only approximately half of children and young people (CYP) with mental health difficulties access mental health services in England, with under-identification of need as a contributing factor. Schools may be an ideal setting for identifying mental health difficulties in CYP, but uncertainty remains about the processes by which these needs can best be identified and addressed. In this study, we conducted a two-round, three-panel Delphi study with parents, school staff, mental health practitioners, and researchers to inform the development of a program to identify mental health difficulties in primary schools. We aimed to assess and build consensus regarding (a) the aims of such a program, (b) identification model preferences, (c) key features of the identification model, and (d) key features of the implementation model. A total of 54 and 42 participants completed the Round 1 and 2 questionnaires, respectively. In general, responses indicated that all three panels supported the idea of school-based identification of mental health difficulties. Overall, 53 of a possible 99 items met the criteria for inclusion as program core components. Five main priorities emerged, including that (a) the program should identify children experiencing mental health difficulties across the continuum of severity, as well as children exposed to adversity, who are at greater risk of mental health difficulties; (b) the program should train staff and educate pupils about mental health in parallel; (c) parental consent should be obtained on an opt-out basis; (d) the program must include clear mechanisms for connecting identified pupils to care and support; and (e) to maximize implementation success, the program needs to lie within a school culture that values mental health and wellbeing. In highlighting these priorities, our study provides needed stakeholder consensus to guide further development and evaluation of mental health interventions within schools.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesAdolescentChildDelphi TechniqueHumansParentsSchoolsChildrenDelphiIdentificationMental healthSchoolsScreening

Identifiers

PMID35190077
PMCPMC8891236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.