Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189974›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2022

Perioperative fluid administration and complications in emergency gastrointestinal surgery-an observational study.

Anders W Voldby, Anne A Aaen, Roberto Loprete, Hassan A Eskandarani, Anders W Boolsen, Simon Jønck, Sarah Ekeloef, Jakob Burcharth, Lau C Thygesen, Ann M Møller and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anders W VoldbyDepartment of Surgery, Holbæk Hospital, part of Copenhagen University Hospitals, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300, Holbaek, Denmark.
Anne A AaenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.
Roberto LopreteDepartment of Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Hassan A EskandaraniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.
Anders W BoolsenDepartment of Surgery, Holbæk Hospital, part of Copenhagen University Hospitals, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300, Holbaek, Denmark.
Simon JønckDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.
Sarah EkeloefDepartment of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Jakob BurcharthDepartment of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Lau C ThygesenDepartment of Population Health and Morbidity, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ann M MøllerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Birgitte BrandstrupDepartment of Surgery, Holbæk Hospital, part of Copenhagen University Hospitals, Smedelundsgade 60, 4300, Holbaek, Denmark. bbrn@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2659-1198
Holbæk Sygehus · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DKSlagelse Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fluid balance associated with a better outcome following emergency surgery is unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the association of the perioperative fluid balance and postoperative complications during emergency gastrointestinal surgery.

methodsWe retrospectively included patients undergoing emergency surgery for gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation. A perioperative fluid balance of 2.5 L divided the cohort in a conservative and liberal group. Outcome was Clavien-Dindo graded complications registered 90 days postoperatively. We used logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists' classification, use of epidural analgesia, use of vasopressor, type of surgery, intraabdominal pathology, and hospital. Predicted risk of complications was demonstrated on a continuous scale of the fluid balance.

resultsWe included 342 patients operated between July 2014 and July 2015 from three centers. The perioperative fluid balance was 1.6 L IQR [1.0 to 2.0] in the conservative vs. 3.6 L IQR [3.0 to 5.3] in the liberal group. Odds ratio of overall 2.6 (95% CI 1.5 to 4.4), p < 0.001, and cardiopulmonary complications 3.2 (95% CI 1.9 to 5.7), p < 0.001, were increased in the liberal group. A perioperative fluid balance of 0-2 L was associated with minimal risk of cardiopulmonary complications compared to 1.5-3.5 L for renal complications.

conclusionWe found a perioperative fluid balance above 2.5 L to be associated with an increased risk of overall and cardiopulmonary complications following emergency surgery for gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation. A perioperative fluid balance of 0-2 L was associated with the lowest risk of cardiopulmonary complications and 1.5-3.5 L for renal complications.

Indexed as

Fluid therapyIntestinal obstructionIntestinal perforationIntraoperative carePostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID35189974
PMCPMC8862386
OpenAlexW4213162314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.