Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189949›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022

Natural history of respiratory muscle strength in spinal muscular atrophy: a prospective national cohort study.

Esther S Veldhoen, Camiel A Wijngaarde, Erik H J Hulzebos, Roelie M Wösten-van Asperen, Renske I Wadman, Ruben P A van Eijk, Fay Lynn Asselman, Marloes Stam, Louise A M Otto, Inge Cuppen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther S Veldhoen *Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, PO box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E.S.Veldhoen@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2918-9989
Camiel A Wijngaarde *Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erik H J HulzebosChild Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roelie M Wösten-van AsperenDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, PO box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Renske I WadmanDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ruben P A van EijkDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fay Lynn AsselmanDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marloes StamDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Louise A M OttoDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inge CuppenDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Feline E V ScheijmansDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura P Verweij-van den OudenrijnDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, PO box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bart BartelsChild Development and Exercise Center, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michael A GaytantDepartment of Pulmonology, Center of Home Mechanical Ventilation, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis K van der EntDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Member of ERN-LUNG, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W Ludo van der PolDepartment of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory complications are the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Respiratory muscle weakness results in impaired cough, recurrent respiratory tract infections and eventually can cause respiratory failure. We assessed longitudinal patterns of respiratory muscle strength in a national cohort of treatment-naïve children and adults with SMA, hypothesizing a continued decline throughout life.

methodsWe measured maximal expiratory and inspiratory pressure (PE

resultsWe included 2172 measurements of respiratory muscle function from 80 treatment-naïve patients with SMA types 1c-3b. All outcomes were lower in the more severe phenotypes. Significant differences in PEF were present between SMA types from early ages onwards. PEF decline was linear (1-2%/year). PEF reached values below 80% during early childhood in types 1c-2, and during adolescence in type 3a. PE

conclusionsThere are clear differences in respiratory muscle strength and its progressive decline between SMA types. We observed lower outcomes in more severe SMA types. Particularly PEF may be a suitable outcome measure for the follow-up of respiratory strength in patients with SMA. PEF declines in a rather linear pattern in all SMA types, with clear differences at baseline. These natural history data may serve as a reference for longer-term treatment efficacy assessments.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalRespiratory InsufficiencyChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCoughHumansMuscle StrengthProspective StudiesRespiratory MusclesLung functionNatural historyNeuromuscularRespiratory muscle strengthSpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID35189949
PMCPMC8862532
OpenAlexW4226208042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.