Observational studyOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
Eight months follow-up of corneal nerves and sensitivity after treatment with cenegermin for neurotrophic keratopathy.
Observational study in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant human nerve growth factor (cenegermin) for moderate-to-severe dry eye: phase II, randomized, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging trial.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Characteristics of the ocular surface in neurotrophic keratitis induced by trigeminal nerve injury following neurosurgery.International ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Corneal nerve regeneration: treatments and monitoring approaches.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of an Ophthalmic Cooling Device on Corneal Immune and Sensory Nerve Features in Chronic Ocular Surface Pain: A Prospective, Feasibility Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Clusterin reverses epitheliopathy, reduces inflammation, and restores goblet cells and corneal nerves in a mouse model of autoimmune dry eye.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Corneal Sensory Receptors and Pharmacological Therapies to Modulate Ocular Pain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Non-contact confocal calcium imaging ofBiomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Development and Characterization of a Photocrosslinkable, Chitosan-Based, Nerve Growth Factor-Eluting Hydrogel for the Ocular Surface.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Phase IV Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label Clinical Trial of Cenegermin (rhNGF) for Stage 1 Neurotrophic Keratopathy (DEFENDO).Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- A New Treatment for Recalcitrant Neurotrophic Keratopathy of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease with Virus Infection.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- The use of rh-NGF in the management of neurotrophic keratopathy.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Review
- A Vicious NGF-p75International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Topical Decorin Reduces Corneal Inflammation and Imparts Neuroprotection in a Mouse Model of Benzalkonium Chloride-induced Corneal Neuropathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Effect of recombinant human nerve growth factor treatment on corneal nerve regeneration in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- A, B, C's of Trk Receptors and Their Ligands in Ocular Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Utility of cenegermin for the management of neurotrophic keratopathy after penetrating keratoplasty.Oman journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroudCenegermin (Oxervate, Dompè Farmaceutici, Milan, IT), a recombinant human NGF, is a potentially healing new drug for neurotrophic keratopathy (NK), a rare but challenging disease affecting the cornea. To date, studies that evaluate its mid-term effect on corneal nerves and sensitivity are lacking.
objectiveTo evaluate the recovery and morphology of subbasal corneal nerves in patients treated with Cenegermin for NK and assess their correlation with corneal sensitivity.
methodsThis prospective, observational case series study was carried out between May 2018 and August 2020 at the Ophthalmic Clinic of the University of Verona. Clinical evaluation, sensitivity, and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) were performed in the central and all four corneal sectors at baseline, the end of therapy (8 weeks), and 2, 4, and 8 months after therapy. Consecutive patients with NK (stage 2-3), treated with Cenegermin (1 drop 6 times daily for 8 weeks), were enrolled. During each visit, Corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber total branch density (CTBD), corneal nerve fiber fractal dimension (CNFraD) and Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry (CBE) were measured.
resultsWe enrolled 18 patients. Complete NK healing was noted in 14/18(78%) patients after 8 weeks of treatment; then in 14(78%), 15(83%), and 13(72%) patients at 2-, 4-, and 8-months, respectively. Starting at 8 weeks through 4-month follow-up there was progressive improvement in CBE in all corneal sectors (p ≤ 0.01), which continued thereafter. There was significant corneal nerve regrowth especially in the peripheral cornea: centripetal progression starting at 8 weeks (CNFL and CNFrad) and significant branching starting at 2 months (CTBD), which continued through to the end of follow up. Sector-coupled IVCM and CBE findings correlated at all evaluations (all r ≥ 0.62 starting at 2 months, with highest values in the peripheral sectors).
conclusionsAfter Cenegermin we observed a subbasal corneal nerve regeneration, a recovery of sensitivity and a lasting epithelial healing, suggesting that the effect of its action persists several months after discontinuation in patients with NK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.