Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189938›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2022

Health systems resilience in fragile and shock-prone settings through the prism of gender equity and justice: implications for research, policy and practice.

Wesam Mansour, Abriti Arjyal, Chad Hughes, Emma Tiange Gbaoh, Fouad Mohamed Fouad, Haja Wurie, Hnin Kalayar Kyaw, Julie Tartaggia, Kate Hawkins, Kyu Kyu Than and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Wesam MansourDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK. wesamatif@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-5381
Abriti ArjyalHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Chad HughesBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Emma Tiange GbaohCollege of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Fouad Mohamed FouadFaculty of Health and Sciences, American University in Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Haja WurieCollege of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Hnin Kalayar KyawBurnet Institute, Yangon, Myanmar.
Julie TartaggiaBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Kate HawkinsPamoja Communications Ltd., Brighton, UK.
Kyu Kyu ThanBurnet Institute, Yangon, Myanmar.
Lansana Hassim KallonCollege of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Maya Abou SaadFaculty of Health and Sciences, American University in Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Obindra ChandHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Phone Myint WinBurnet Institute, Yangon, Myanmar.
Rouham YamoutFaculty of Health and Sciences, American University in Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Shophika RegmiHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sushil BaralHERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sally TheobaldDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Joanna RavenDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Funding

Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office PO 8610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile and shock-prone settings (FASP) present a critical development challenge, eroding efforts to build healthy, sustainable and equitable societies. Power relations and inequities experienced by people because of social markers, e.g., gender, age, education, ethnicity, and race, intersect leading to poverty and associated health challenges. Concurrent to the growing body of literature exploring the impact of these intersecting axes of inequity in FASP settings, there is a need to identify actions promoting gender, equity, and justice (GEJ). Gender norms that emphasise toxic masculinity, patriarchy, societal control over women and lack of justice are unfortunately common throughout the world and are exacerbated in FASP settings. It is critical that health policies in FASP settings consider GEJ and include strategies that promote progressive changes in power relationships. ReBUILD for Resilience (ReBUILD) focuses on health systems resilience in FASP settings and is underpinned by a conceptual framework that is grounded in a broader view of health systems as complex adaptive systems. The framework identifies links between different capacities and enables identification of feedback loops which can drive or inhibit the emergence and implementation of resilient approaches. We applied the framework to four different country case studies (Lebanon, Myanmar, Nepal and Sierra Leone) to illustrate how it can be inclusive of GEJ concerns, to inform future research and support context responsive recommendations to build equitable and inclusive health systems in FASP settings.

Indexed as

EquityFragile and shock-prone settingsGenderHealth systemsResilience

Identifiers

PMID35189938
PMCPMC8860254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.