Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189932›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2022

viralFlye: assembling viruses and identifying their hosts from long-read metagenomics data.

Dmitry Antipov, Mikhail Rayko, Mikhail Kolmogorov, Pavel A Pevzner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Knowing and Naming: Phage Annotation and Nomenclature for Phage Therapy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dmitry AntipovCenter for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia. d.antipov@spbu.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-6087-0660
Mikhail RaykoCenter for Algorithmic Biotechnology, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Mikhail KolmogorovDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Pavel A PevznerDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
St Petersburg University · RUUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the use of long-read sequencing improves the contiguity of assembled viral genomes compared to short-read methods, assembling complex viral communities remains an open problem. We describe the viralFlye tool for identification and analysis of metagenome-assembled viruses in long-read assemblies. We show it significantly improves viral assemblies and demonstrate that long-reads result in a much larger array of predicted virus-host associations as compared to short-read assemblies. We demonstrate that the identification of novel CRISPR arrays in bacterial genomes from a newly assembled metagenomic sample provides information for predicting novel hosts for novel viruses.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsVirusesGenome, BacterialMetagenomeSequence Analysis, DNAAssemblyLong readsVirus detection

Identifiers

PMID35189932
PMCPMC8862349
OpenAlexW4212865112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.