ArticleBMC nursing2022
Integrating simulation training during clinical practice in nursing homes: an experimental study of nursing students' knowledge acquisition, self-efficacy and learning needs.
Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Versus Patient-Based Clinical Education in Nursing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nursing open · 2026Pooled it
- The effects of case-based, problem-based, and team-based learning on nursing students' problem-solving, self-directed learning, and communication skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of community-based tabletop simulation on disaster nursing competency, preparedness, transfer motivation, and self-efficacy: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Empowering future nurses: a focus group study on simulation for transition to clinical practice.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of isolation training given to the caregivers of patients in isolation with different methods: a randomized controlled study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Problem-solving method and cooperative learning model in nursing education: a single-group pre-post-test study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The Effect of "Online-Simulation-Bedside" Three-Step Teaching Method in Team Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Training of Emergency Department and Critical Care Nursing Interns-An Analysis Based on Kirkpatrick Model.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- A qualitative study of the value of simulation-based training for nursing students in primary care.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- In situ simulation training strengthened bachelor of nursing students' experienced learning and development process- a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Article
- Facilitators Associated with Nursing Burnout in the Ambulatory Care Setting as COVID-19 Subsides: A Rapid Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited access to supervision, feedback and quality learning experiences pose challenges to learning in the clinical setting for first-year nursing students who are beginning their clinical experiences. Prior studies have indicated that simulation training, as a partial replacement of clinical practice hours, may improve learning. However, there has been little research on simulation training integrated as a partial replacement during first-year students' clinical practice in nursing homes. The primary aim of this study was to examine first-year nursing students' knowledge acquisition and self-efficacy in integrating a partial replacement of clinical hours in nursing homes with simulation training. Its secondary aim was to examine perceptions of how learning needs were met in the simulated environment compared with the clinical environment.
designThe primary aim was addressed using an experimental design that included pre- and post-tests. The secondary aim was investigated using a descriptive survey-based comparison.
methodsFirst-year students at a Norwegian university college (n = 116) were asked to participate. Those who agreed (n = 103) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 52) or the control group (n = 51). A knowledge test, the General Self-efficacy Scale and the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey were used to measure students' outcomes and perceptions. The data were analysed using independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests and paired samples t-tests.
resultsKnowledge scores from pre- to post-tests were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group with a medium to large effect size (p < 0.01, Hedges' g = 0.6). No significant differences in self-efficacy were identified. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the simulated and the clinical environment with regard to meeting learning needs; effect sizes ranged from small and medium to large (Cohen's d from 0.3 to 1.0).
conclusionIntegrating the partial replacement of clinical hours in nursing homes with simulation training for first-year nursing students was positively associated with knowledge acquisition and meeting learning needs. These findings are promising with regard to simulation as a viable partial replacement for traditional clinical practice in nursing homes to improve learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.