ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2023
Innovative Quantitative Assessment of Hand Function in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compromises fine sensorimotor function during activities of daily living and affects a large number of individuals with high burden costs for society. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively characterize fine movement skills in CTS patients preoperatively and at 1 month postoperatively by means of a sensor-engineered glove, in order to provide new insights for evaluative and finally therapeutic purposes.
methodsForty-one CTS patients and 41 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) were analyzed by adopting the engineered glove Hand Test System (HTS), which previously demonstrated its reliability and sensitivity to detect hands dysfunction in several neurological diseases. A sub-group of 11 CTS subjects was re-tested 1 month after surgery. Three parameters-touch duration (TD), inter-tapping interval (ITI), and movement rate (MR)-were considered to characterize hand function.
resultsThe affected hand of CTS patients generally showed worst finger opposition performances than HC. Comparing the dominant hand, all parameters were able to significantly discriminate CTS patients from HC. Considering the nondominant hand, the best performing parameter in discriminating CTS from HC was TD. The follow-up assessment at 1 month after surgery showed that considered parameters were able to monitor patients' recovery. In particular, the TD parameter recorded at the 3 different assigned task modalities resulted significantly enhanced.
conclusionsResults of this pilot study proved the validity of the parameters obtained through the sensor-engineered glove to assess objectively hand functional status and surgical outcomes in CTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.