Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189634›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Systematic evaluation of computational tools to predict the effects of mutations on protein stability in the absence of experimental structures.

Qisheng Pan, Thanh Binh Nguyen, David B Ascher, Douglas E V Pires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. DSSP 4: FAIR annotation of protein secondary structure.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. AlphaFold2 and its applications in the fields of biology and medicine.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qisheng PanComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Thanh Binh NguyenComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
David B AscherComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2948-2413
Douglas E V PiresComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3004-2119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in protein sequence can have dramatic effects on how proteins fold, their stability and dynamics. Over the last 20 years, pioneering methods have been developed to try to estimate the effects of missense mutations on protein stability, leveraging growing availability of protein 3D structures. These, however, have been developed and validated using experimentally derived structures and biophysical measurements. A large proportion of protein structures remain to be experimentally elucidated and, while many studies have based their conclusions on predictions made using homology models, there has been no systematic evaluation of the reliability of these tools in the absence of experimental structural data. We have, therefore, systematically investigated the performance and robustness of ten widely used structural methods when presented with homology models built using templates at a range of sequence identity levels (from 15% to 95%) and contrasted performance with sequence-based tools, as a baseline. We found there is indeed performance deterioration on homology models built using templates with sequence identity below 40%, where sequence-based tools might become preferable. This was most marked for mutations in solvent exposed residues and stabilizing mutations. As structure prediction tools improve, the reliability of these predictors is expected to follow, however we strongly suggest that these factors should be taken into consideration when interpreting results from structure-based predictors of mutation effects on protein stability.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsDatabases, ProteinMutationProtein StabilityReproducibility of ResultsProteinsAlphaFold2homology modellingmutation effects on protein stabilityperformance evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35189634
PMCPMC9155634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.