Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189537›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2022

Parallel evolution and differences in seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody between patients with cancer and health care workers in a tertiary cancer centre during the first and second wave of COVID-19 pandemic: canSEROcov-II cross-sectional study.

Sylvain Ladoire, Emilie Rederstorff, Vincent Goussot, Sophie Parnalland, Nathalie Briot, Elise Ballot, Caroline Truntzer, Siavoshe Ayati, Leila Bengrine-Lefevre, Nathalie Bremaud and 21 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvain LadoireDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France. Electronic address: sladoire@cgfl.fr.
Emilie RederstorffClinical Research Center (CRC), Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Vincent GoussotDepartment of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Sophie ParnallandClinical Research Center (CRC), Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Nathalie BriotMethodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Elise BallotResearch Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; Bioinformatic Core Facility Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France.
Caroline TruntzerResearch Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; Bioinformatic Core Facility Georges-François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France.
Siavoshe AyatiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Leila Bengrine-LefevreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Nathalie BremaudDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Bruno CoudertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Isabelle DesmoulinsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Laure FavierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Cléa FraisseDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Jean-David FumetDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Audrey HennequinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Alice HervieuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Silvia IlieDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Courèche KaderbhaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Aurélie LagrangeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Nils MartinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Irina MaziluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Didier MayeurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Rémi PalmierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Anne-Laure Simonet-LammDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Julie VincentDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Sylvie ZanettaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Laurent ArnouldResearch Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Department of Pathology and Tumor Biology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Charles CoutantUniversity of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France; Department of Oncologic Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
Aurélie BertautMethodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
François GhiringhelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Research Platform in Biological Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Centre de Recherche INSERM LNC-UMR1231, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, France.
Centre Georges François Leclerc · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cancer are a population at high risk of severe infection from SARS-CoV-2. Patients with cancer regularly attend specialised healthcare centres for management and treatment, where they are in contact with healthcare workers (HCWs). Numerous recommendations target both patients with cancer and HCWs to minimise the spread of SARS-CoV-2 during these interactions.

objectiveTo investigate the parallel evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic in these 2 populations over time, we studied the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after both the first and second waves of the pandemic, and in both cancer patients and HCWs from a single specialised anti-cancer centre. Factors associated with seropositivity were identified in both populations.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study after the second wave of the COVID pandemic in France. All participants were invited to undergo serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 and complete a questionnaire collecting data about their working conditions (for HCWs) or medical management (for patients) during this period. Results after the second wave were compared to those of a previous study among 1011 patients with cancer and 663 HCWs performed in the same centre after the first wave, using the same evaluations.

findingsWe included 502 HCWs and 507 patients with cancer. Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was higher after the second wave than after the first wave in both HCWs (15.1% versus 1.8%; p < 0.001), and patients (4.1% versus 1.7%; p = 0.038). By multivariate analysis, the factors found to be associated with seropositivity after the second wave for HCWs were: working in direct patient care (p = 0.050); having worked in a dedicated COVID-19 unit (p = 0.0036); contact with a person with COVID-19-positive in the workplace (p = 0.0118) or outside of the workplace (p = 0.0297). Among patients with cancer, only a contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19 was found to be significantly associated with positive serology. The proportion of reported contacts with individuals with COVID-19-positive was significantly lower among patients with cancer than among HCWs (7.6% versus 40.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001)

interpretationBetween the first and second waves of the epidemic in France, the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies increased to a lesser extent among patients with cancer than among their HCWs, possibly due to better self-protection, notably social distancing. The risk factors for infection identified among HCWs plead in favour of numerous intra-hospital contaminations, especially for HCWs in contact with high-risk patients. This underlines the compelling need to pursue efforts to implement strict hygiene and personal protection measures (including vaccination) to protect HCWs and patients with cancer.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodyCancer centerCancer patientsCOVID-19Cross sectional studyHealth care workersSARS-CoV-2SerologySeroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID35189537
PMCPMC8806022
OpenAlexW4210272353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.