Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189111›Full record

ReviewThe Annals of thoracic surgery2022

Multi-institutional Analysis of 505 Patients With Coronavirus Disease-2019 Supported With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Predictors of Survival.

Celeste A Hall, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Alfred H Stammers, James D St Louis, J W Awori Hayanga, Michael S Firstenberg, Linda B Mongero, Eric A Tesdahl, Keshava Rajagopal, Faisal H Cheema and 5 more

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Real-World Outcomes for ECMO in COVID-19.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Celeste A HallDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Jeffrey P JacobsDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Medical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: jeffreyjacobs@ufl.edu.
Alfred H StammersMedical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee.
James D St LouisDepartments of Surgery and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia.
J W Awori HayangaDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Michael S FirstenbergSt. Elizabeth Medical Center, Appleton, Wisconsin.
Linda B MongeroMedical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee.
Eric A TesdahlMedical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee.
Keshava RajagopalUniversity of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Faisal H CheemaUniversity of Houston, Houston, Texas; HCA Healthcare Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
Kirti PatelMedical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee.
Tom ColeyMedical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee.
Anthony K SestokasMedical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc, Nashville, Tennessee.
Marvin J SlepianUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Vinay BadhwarDepartment of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe reviewed our experience with 505 patients with confirmed coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at 45 hospitals and estimated risk factors for mortality.

methodsA multi-institutional database was created and used to assess all patients with COVID-19 who were supported with ECMO. A Bayesian mixed-effects logistic regression model was estimated to assess the effect on survival of multiple potential risk factors for mortality, including age at cannulation for ECMO as well as days between diagnosis of COVID-19 and intubation and days between intubation and cannulation for ECMO.

resultsMedian time on ECMO was 18 days (interquartile range, 10-29 days). All 505 patients separated from ECMO: 194 patients (38.4%) survived and 311 patients (61.6%) died. Survival with venovenous ECMO was 184 of 466 patients (39.5%), and survival with venoarterial ECMO was 8 of 30 patients (26.7%). Survivors had lower median age (44 vs 51 years, P < .001) and shorter median time interval from diagnosis to intubation (7 vs 11 days, P = .001). Adjusting for several confounding factors, we estimated that an ECMO patient intubated on day 14 after the diagnosis of COVID-19 vs day 4 had a relative odds of survival of 0.65 (95% credible interval, 0.44-0.96; posterior probability of negative effect, 98.5%). Age was also negatively associated with survival: relative to a 38-year-old patient, we estimated that a 57-year-old patient had a relative odds of survival of 0.43 (95% credible interval, 0.30-0.61; posterior probability of negative effect, >99.99%).

conclusionsECMO facilitates salvage and survival of select critically ill patients with COVID-19. Survivors tend to be younger and have shorter time from diagnosis to intubation. Survival of patients supported with only venovenous ECMO was 39.5%.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationAdultBayes TheoremHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35189111
PMCPMC8855605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.