Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189081›Full record

ArticleJornal de pediatria

Autopsy in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: pathological and clinical agreement.

Camila Penso, Andréa L Corso, Cláudia R Hentges, Rita C Silveira, Raquel C Rivero, Bruna S Rojas, Tatiana S Tellechea, Renato S Procianoy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of Clinical Diagnosis and Autopsy Findings of Early Neonatal Deaths: Diagnostic Challenges and the Value of Autopsy in Identifying Rare Pathologies.Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camila PensoHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Andréa L CorsoHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Pediatria, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: alcorso@hcpa.edu.br.
Cláudia R HentgesHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Rita C SilveiraHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Pediatria, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Raquel C RiveroHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Patologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Bruna S RojasHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Tatiana S TellecheaHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Renato S ProcianoyHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Neonatologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Pediatria, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate neonatal autopsy rates at a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil ascertain the level of agreement between premortem and postmortem diagnosis.

methodsThe authors reviewed all neonatal autopsies performed over a 10-year period and described the percentage of neonates who died and underwent autopsy. The authors tested for agreement between autopsy findings and the cause of death as defined by the neonatologist. Agreement between clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings was classified using the modified Goldman criteria. Additional findings at autopsy were grouped by organ system. Linear regression and multiple comparisons were used for statistical analyses.

resultsDuring the study period, 382 neonates died at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Consent to perform an autopsy was obtained for 73 (19.1%). The complete agreement between autopsy findings and the neonatologist's premortem diagnosis was found in 48 patients (65.8%). Additional findings were obtained at autopsy in 25 cases (34.2%). In 5 cases (6.9%), the autopsy findings contributed to subsequent genetic counseling. Seven autopsies (9.6%) revealed a diagnosis that would have changed patient management if established premortem. The autopsy rate increased by an average of 1.87% each year.

conclusionDespite a high level of agreement between clinical diagnosis and pathological findings, autopsies provided relevant data regarding the cause of death, providing additional clinical information to neonatologists and allowing genetic counseling of family members.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalAutopsyBrazilCause of DeathHumansInfant, NewbornLinear ModelsRetrospective StudiesAutopsyCause of deathNecropsyNeonate

Identifiers

PMID35189081
PMCPMC9510802
OpenAlexW4213340167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.