Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189024›Full record

ArticleChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2022

Uncertainty Quantification of Reactivity Scales.

Jonny Proppe, Johannes Kircher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Uncertainty Quantification forChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Reactivity of electrophilic cyclopropanes.Pure and applied chemistry. Chimie pure et appliquee · 2023
    Article
  4. Uncertainty Quantification of Reactivity Scales.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonny ProppeGeorg-August University, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Tammannstrasse 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5232-036X
Johannes KircherGeorg-August University, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Tammannstrasse 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

German Research Foundation (DFG) 389479699/GRK2455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to Mayr, polar organic synthesis can be rationalized by a simple empirical relationship linking bimolecular rate constants to as few as three reactivity parameters. Here, we propose an extension to Mayr's reactivity method that is rooted in uncertainty quantification and transforms the reactivity parameters into probability distributions. Through uncertainty propagation, these distributions can be transformed into uncertainty estimates for bimolecular rate constants. Chemists can exploit these virtual error bars to enhance synthesis planning and to decrease the ambiguity of conclusions drawn from experimental data. We demonstrate the above at the example of the reference data set released by Mayr and co-workers [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9500; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13902]. As by-product of the new approach, we obtain revised reactivity parameters for 36 π-nucleophiles and 32 benzhydrylium ions.

Indexed as

KineticsHumansUncertaintycarbocationskineticsnucleophilic additionreactivity scalesuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID35189024
PMCPMC9314972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.