Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189018›Full record

Observational studyInternal medicine journal2022

Telehealth in outpatient delivery of palliative care: a prospective survey evaluation by patients and clinicians.

Jennifer Philip, Olivia Wawryk, Leeanne Pasanen, Aaron Wong, Stephanie Schwetlik, Anna Collins

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal medicine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Technology to Support Older Adults in Home Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Article
  8. Characteristics of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who access palliative care: An observational study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer PhilipDepartment of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-0645
Olivia WawrykDepartment of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria.
Leeanne PasanenParkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria.
Aaron WongParkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0002-6507-1219
Stephanie SchwetlikNorth Adelaide Palliative Service, Modbury Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anna CollinsDepartment of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria.ORCID 0000-0003-2139-0100
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUModbury Hospital · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic new funding models were introduced to support telehealth consultations, resulting in their widescale adoption in palliative care service delivery. Clarity around the clinical circumstances and patient populations that might be most appropriate for telehealth models was required.

aimsTo evaluate patient and physician satisfaction, acceptability and utility of outpatient palliative care provision through telehealth.

methodsThis is a multi-site prospective, cross-sectional, observational study conducted during a time of significant public health restrictions. A survey was used to collect matched patient- and physician-reported perceptions of palliative care telehealth consultations across three metropolitan hospitals in Victoria, Australia.

resultsThere were 127 matched patient-physician data of telehealth consultations and a further 812 physician-only assessments. Telehealth was generally acceptable and satisfactory, with patients providing greater positive scores than clinicians. Telehealth incorporating both audio and video were more acceptable and satisfactory, particularly with the presence of a carer, and during routine reviews. Physicians were less satisfied using telehealth when there was increasing symptom complexity across all domains (pain, psychological, and other symptoms).

conclusionsTelehealth has high utility in palliative care practice. A future hybrid model of care comprising both face-to-face and telehealth consultations seems favoured by patients and physicians but must be accompanied by targeted support for specific patient groups to ensure equitable healthcare access. Further evaluation of telehealth during a time of fewer public health emergency measures and lower community anxiety is required to fully understand its ongoing role.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOutpatientsPalliative CarePandemicsProspective StudiesVictoriaCOVID-19outpatientpalliative caresurvey and questionnairetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35189018
PMCPMC9540442
OpenAlexW4213270794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.