Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35189009›Full record

ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2022

What shapes research and research capacity building in rural health services? Context matters.

Anna Wong Shee, Claire Quilliam, Denise Corboy, Kristen Glenister, Carol McKinstry, Alison Beauchamp, Laura Alston, Darryl Maybery, Drew Aras, Kevin Mc Namara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Identifying the experience of geographical narcissism during medical education and training.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. "Getting in and doing it personally": Engagement strategies for rural school asthma programs.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna Wong SheeBallarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5095-218X
Claire QuilliamThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-0133
Denise CorboyBlue Sky Mind Research Consultancy, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Kristen GlenisterThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-5314
Carol McKinstryLa Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Alison BeauchampMonash University, Warragul, Victoria, Australia.
Laura AlstonDeakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-8845
Darryl MayberyMonash University, Warragul, Victoria, Australia.
Drew ArasWestern Alliance Academic Health Science Centre, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Kevin Mc NamaraDeakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Deakin UniversityWestern Alliance Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the contextual factors influencing research and research capacity building in rural health settings.

designQualitative study using semi-structured telephone interviews to collect data regarding health professionals' research education and capacity building. Analysis involved inductive coding using Braun and Clark's thematic analysis; and deductive mapping to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

settingVictorian rural health services and university campuses.

participantsTwenty senior rural health managers, academics and/or research coordinators. Participants had at least three years' experience in rural public health, health-related research or health education settings.

main outcome measuresContextual factors influencing the operationalisation and prioritisation of research capacity building in rural health services.

resultsFindings reflected the CFIR domains and constructs: intervention characteristics (relative advantage); outer setting (cosmopolitanism, external policies and incentives); inner setting (implementation climate, readiness for implementation); characteristics of individuals (self-efficacy); and process (planning, engaging). Findings illustrated the implementation context and the complex contextual tensions, which either prevent or enhance research capacity building in rural health services.

conclusionsRealising the Australian Government's vision for improved health service provision and health outcomes in rural areas requires a strong culture of research and research capacity building in rural health services. Low levels of rural research funding, chronic workforce shortages and the tension between undertaking research and delivering health care, all significantly impact the operationalisation and prioritisation of research capacity building in rural health services. Effective policy and investment addressing these contextual factors is crucial for the success of research capacity building in rural health services.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingRural Health ServicesAustraliaDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansQualitative Researchcontextual factorsevidence-based health carehealth service developmentimplementing evidencerural workforce development

Identifiers

PMID35189009
PMCPMC9304287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.