Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188688›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2022

Prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy in pregnant women with diabetes-time to individualize photo screening frequency.

Nina Pappot, Nicoline Callesen Do, Marianne Vestgaard, Björg Ásbjörnsdóttir, Javad Nouri Hajari, Henrik Lund-Andersen, Pernille Holmager, Peter Damm, Lene Ringholm, Elisabeth Reinhardt Mathiesen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Screening and evaluation of diabetic retinopathyWorld journal of diabetes · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nina PappotCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicoline Callesen DoCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marianne VestgaardCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7358-8253
Björg ÁsbjörnsdóttirCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0178-3663
Javad Nouri HajariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik Lund-AndersenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pernille HolmagerCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter DammCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene RingholmCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elisabeth Reinhardt MathiesenCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKGlostrup Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy including macular oedema in pregnant women with diabetes and to identify women in whom the frequency of retinal screening can be reduced to minimize the burden of health care visits.

methodsA cohort study of 348 women with pre-existing diabetes were routinely screened with retinal photo in early (12 weeks) and late pregnancy (27 weeks). Diabetic retinopathy was classified in five stages in accordance with National Danish Guidelines based on the eye with the highest retinopathy level. Sight-threatening retinopathy was defined as the presence of proliferative retinopathy and/or clinically significant macular oedema (CSMO).

resultsRetinopathy was present in 52% (116/223) vs. 14% (17/125), with sight-threatening retinopathy in 16% (35/223) vs. 6% (7/125) of women with type 1 and type 2, respectively. Women without retinopathy in early and late pregnancy were characterized by shorter diabetes duration (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.008) and predominance of type 2 diabetes. Amongst the 50% (175/348) of the cohort having no retinopathy in early pregnancy and HbA1c<53 mmol/mol (7.0%), none developed sight-threatening retinopathy and 94% (165/175) remained without any retinopathy during pregnancy. Development of sight-threatening retinopathy was mainly observed in women with retinopathy in early pregnancy. Treatment for sight-threatening retinopathy was given to a minority (2.7 and 2.4%, respectively).

conclusionGood glycaemic control and no retinopathy was seen in a large proportion of women in early pregnancy and none of these women developed sight-threatening retinopathy. The frequency of retinal screening can probably be safely reduced during pregnancy in these women.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrevalencediabetic retinopathymacular oedemapregnancytype 1 diabetestype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35188688
PMCPMC9303564
OpenAlexW4213107331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.