Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188650›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of hematology2022

Antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with lymphoma.

Kentaro Narita, So Nakaji, Rikako Tabata, Toshiki Terao, Ayumi Kuzume, Takafumi Tsushima, Daisuke Ikeda, Ami Fukumoto, Daisuke Miura, Masami Takeuchi and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kentaro NaritaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
So NakajiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Rikako TabataDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Toshiki TeraoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Ayumi KuzumeDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Takafumi TsushimaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Daisuke IkedaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Ami FukumotoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Daisuke MiuraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Masami TakeuchiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Masahiro DoiCentral Laboratory, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Yuka UmezawaCentral Laboratory, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Yoshihito OtsukaCentral Laboratory, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroyuki TakamatsuDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Kosei MatsueDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan. koseimatsue@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-9865
Kameda Medical Center · JPKanazawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with lymphoma are at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); therefore, evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination efficacy is essential. We conducted a prospective observational study to monitor the antibody response in 500 patients with lymphoma after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Antibody levels increased in a stepwise manner after the first and second dose of the vaccine. After completion of the two-dose series, anti-S antibody was negative in 109 patients (21.8%), and below clinically protective levels (anti-S ≥ 264 U/mL) in 236 patients (47.2%). The median anti-S titers at 0-6 months, 7-12 months, 13-24 months, and 24 months after treatment completion were 0.4 U/mL, 3.8 U/mL, 270 U/mL, and 650 U/mL, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that receiving the vaccine < 6 months since completing treatment, white blood cell count < 5050/μL, percentage of CD19 + cells < 10%, CD4 + cells < 27%, immunoglobulin (Ig) A < 195 mg/dL, IgM < 50 mg/dL, serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor > 600 U/mL, and presence of lymphoma cells in the peripheral blood were significantly correlated with anti-S < 264 U/mL. Lymphoma patients had variably impaired antibody response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We identified various factors to predict COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in lymphoma patients that may help tailoring possible vaccine boosters.

Indexed as

COVID-19LymphomaVaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineLymphoma

Identifiers

PMID35188650
PMCPMC8859496
OpenAlexW4213154324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.