Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188591›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis.

A Bastounis, T Langley, S Davis, Z Paskins, N Gittoes, J Leonardi-Bee, O Sahota

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparing medication adherence in patients receiving bisphosphonates for preventing fragility fractures: a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Research priorities regarding the use of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a UK priority setting exercise.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A BastounisDivision of Epidemiology & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. Anastasios.Bastounis1@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-9373
T LangleyDivision of Epidemiology & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
S DavisSchool of Health and Related Research, Regent Court (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Z PaskinsSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, ST5 5BG, UK.
N GittoesCentre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
J Leonardi-BeeDivision of Epidemiology & Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
O SahotaQueens Medical Centre (QMC), University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme NIHR127550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures; however, high rates of adherence are needed to preserve clinical benefits.

objectiveTo investigate persistence and compliance to oral and intravenous bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate).

methodsSearches of 12 databases, unpublished sources, and trial registries were conducted, covering the period from 2000 to April 2021. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool 1.0 & ROBINS-I) were independently undertaken by two study authors. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patients' adherence were included. Network meta-analyses (NMA) embedded within a Bayesian framework were conducted, investigating users' likelihood in discontinuing bisphosphonate treatment. Where meta-analysis was not possible, data were synthesised using the vote-counting synthesis method.

resultsFifty-nine RCTs and 43 observational studies were identified, resulting in a total population of 2,656,659 participants. Data from 59 RCTs and 24 observational studies were used to populate NMAs. Zoledronate users were the least likely to discontinue their treatment HR = 0.73 (95%CrI: 0.61, 0.88). Higher rates of compliance were observed in those receiving intravenous treatments. The paucity of data and the heterogeneity in the reported medication possession ratio thresholds precluded a NMA of compliance data.

conclusionsUsers of intravenously administered bisphosphonates were found to be the most adherent to treatment among bisphosphonates' users. Patterns of adherence will permit the more precise estimation of clinical and cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates.

trial registrationPROSPERO 2020 CRD42020177166.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsFractures, BoneDiphosphonatesHumansMedication AdherenceZoledronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesZoledronic AcidAdherenceBisphosphonatesComplianceDiscontinuationNetwork meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35188591
PMCPMC9106630
OpenAlexW4212789036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.