Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022
A randomized, open-label, multicenter study of switching to brolucizumab with or without a loading dose for patients with suboptimal anatomically controlled neovascular age-related macular degeneration-the FALCON study.
Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04679935 (A 52-week, Two Arm, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Brolucizumab 6 mg Dosing Regimens for Patients With Suboptimal Anatomically Controlled Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 52-week, Two Arm, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Brolucizumab 6 mg Dosing Regimens for Patients With Suboptimal Anatomically Controlled Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Ranibizumab to Brolucizumab in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Multicenter Real-World Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Short-term outcomes of intravitreal faricimab for refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Switching from a Fixed Monthly Aflibercept Regimen to Bi-Monthly Brolucizumab in Refractory Cases of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Intravitreal faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration previously treated with traditional anti-VEGF compounds: a real-world prospective study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Investigation of satisfaction with short-term outcomes after switching to faricimab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Brolucizumab in Pretreated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Case Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Morphological Macular Changes Under Brolucizumab Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Refractory to Previous Anti-VEGF Treatment Compared with Treatment-Naive Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Brolucizumab for the Treatment of Degenerative Macular Conditions: A Review of Clinical Studies.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment initiation with brolucizumab, a new potent anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, is typically performed with three monthly injections (loading dose) and has been well studied in treatment-naïve patients. However, no clinical data are available yet on whether or not anti-VEGF pretreated patients also benefit from a loading dose. In the clinical setting, different heterogeneous treatment patterns are used as no clinical trial has addressed this so far in a head-to-head comparison. Therefore, the FALCON study is investigating whether patients with unsatisfactory response to previous anti-VEGF treatments benefit from a loading dose at the switch to brolucizumab treatment.
methodsFALCON is a 52-week, two-arm, randomized, open-label, multicenter, multinational study in patients with residually active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who will be randomized 1:1 and started with brolucizumab 6 mg loading (three monthly loading doses) or brolucizumab 6 mg non-loading (one initial injection) and consecutive treatment every 12 weeks, respectively. The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of the non-loading vs. loading arm in mean change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to the mean value at week 40 to week 52. Secondary objectives include the assessment of anatomical outcomes, treatment intervals, safety and tolerability.
resultsFALCON will be the first study to assess treatment initiation with an anti-VEGF agent in a switch situation with or without loading dose in patients with nAMD.
conclusionsThe results will support the optimization of treatment of patients with previous unsatisfactory anti-VEGF response. Therefore, we expect to see an impact on current clinical practice which has been established for more than a decade.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT04679935, date of registration-22-Dec 2020; EUDRACT number: 2019-004763-53, date of registration-03 Dec 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.