Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188555›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Time to Functional Recovery After Laser Tonsillotomy Performed Under Local Anesthesia vs Conventional Tonsillectomy With General Anesthesia Among Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Justin E R E Wong Chung, Rozemarie van Geet, Noud van Helmond, Chloé Kastoer, Stefan Böhringer, Wilbert B van den Hout, Hendrik P Verschuur, Ferdinand A W Peek, Patrick F M Dammeijer, Gijs K A van Wermeskerken and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Regarding: Refining the interpretation of intracapsular tonsillectomy for adult obstructive sleep apnoea with tonsillar hypertrophy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Letter to the editor regarding "Health-related quality of life and functional recovery outcomes following tonsillectomy among patients in Hail, Saudi Arabia".European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Error in a Figure.JAMA network open · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Justin E R E Wong ChungDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hagaziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Rozemarie van GeetDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hagaziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Noud van HelmondDepartment of Anesthesiology, Cooper University Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey.
Chloé KastoerDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hagaziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Stefan BöhringerDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Wilbert B van den HoutDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hendrik P VerschuurDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Ferdinand A W PeekDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Reinier de Graaf, Delft, the Netherlands.
Patrick F M DammeijerDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands.
Gijs K A van WermeskerkenDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Peter Paul G van BenthemDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Henk M BlomDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hagaziekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLCooper University Health Care · USHaga Hospital · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Carbon dioxide laser tonsillotomy performed under local anesthesia may be an effective and less invasive alternative than dissection tonsillectomy for treatment of tonsil-related afflictions. Objective: To compare functional recovery and symptom relief among adults undergoing tonsillectomy or tonsillotomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 secondary and tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands from January 2018 to December 2019. Participants were 199 adult patients with an indication for surgical tonsil removal randomly assigned to either the tonsillectomy or tonsillotomy group. Interventions: For tonsillotomy, the crypts of the palatine tonsil were evaporated using a carbon dioxide laser under local anesthesia, whereas tonsillectomy consisted of total tonsil removal performed under general anesthesia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to functional recovery measured within 2 weeks after surgery assessed for a modified intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes were time to return to work after surgery, resolution of primary symptoms, severity of remaining symptoms, surgical complications, postoperative pain and analgesics use, and overall patient satisfaction assessed for the intention-to-treat population. Results: Of 199 patients (139 [70%] female; mean [SD] age, 29 [9] years), 98 were randomly assigned to tonsillotomy and 101 were randomly assigned to tonsillectomy. Recovery within 2 weeks after surgery was significantly shorter after tonsillotomy than after tonsillectomy (hazard ratio for recovery after tonsillectomy vs tonsillotomy, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5). Two weeks after surgery, 72 (77%) patients in the tonsillotomy group were fully recovered compared with 26 (57%) patients in the tonsillectomy group. Time until return to work within 2 weeks was also shorter after tonsillotomy (median [IQR], 4.5 [3.0-7.0] days vs 12.0 [9.0-14.0] days; hazard ratio for return after tonsillectomy vs tonsillotomy, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4.). Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 2 patients (2%) in the tonsillotomy group and 8 patients (12%) in the tonsillectomy group. At 6 months after surgery, fewer patients in the tonsillectomy group (25; 35%) than in the tonsillotomy group (54; 57%) experienced persistent symptoms (difference of 22%; 95% CI, 7%-37%). Most patients with persistent symptoms in both the tonsillotomy (32 of 54; 59%) and tonsillectomy (16 of 25; 64%) groups reported mild symptoms 6 months after surgery. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that compared with tonsillectomy performed under general anesthesia, laser tonsillotomy performed under local anesthesia had a significantly shorter and less painful recovery period. A higher percentage of patients had persistent symptoms after tonsillotomy, although the intensity of these symptoms was lower than before surgery. These results suggest that laser tonsillotomy performed under local anesthesia may be a feasible alternative to conventional tonsillectomy in this population. Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NL6866 (NTR7044).

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, LocalTonsillectomyAdultDissectionFemaleHumansLaser TherapyMaleNetherlandsPalatine TonsilPostoperative HemorrhagePostoperative PainRecovery of FunctionReturn to WorkYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35188555
PMCPMC8861850
OpenAlexW4213223492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.