Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188551›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Mortality Among Adults With Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy and Infected With COVID-19.

Csilla Várnai, Claire Palles, Roland Arnold, Helen M Curley, Karin Purshouse, Vinton W T Cheng, Stephen Booth, Naomi A Campton, Graham P Collins, Daniel J Hughes and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Csilla VárnaiCentre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Claire PallesInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Roland ArnoldInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Helen M CurleyInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Karin PurshouseEdinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Vinton W T ChengLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Stephen BoothOxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Haematology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Naomi A CamptonInstitute of Translational Medicine, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Graham P CollinsOxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Haematology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniel J HughesDepartment of Cancer Imaging, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Austin G KulasekararajDepartment of Haematology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Alvin J X LeeUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anna C Olsson-BrownThe Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, United Kingdom.
Archana Sharma-OatesInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Mieke Van HemelrijckTranslational Oncology and Urology Research, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lennard Y W LeeInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Rachel KerrDepartment of Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Gary MiddletonCancer Research UK Birmingham Centre, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jean-Baptiste CazierCentre for Computational Biology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
UKCCMP Team
University of Birmingham · GBChurchill Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBKing's College Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 30195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Large cohorts of patients with active cancers and COVID-19 infection are needed to provide evidence of the association of recent cancer treatment and cancer type with COVID-19 mortality. Objective: To evaluate whether systemic anticancer treatments (SACTs), tumor subtypes, patient demographic characteristics (age and sex), and comorbidities are associated with COVID-19 mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: The UK Coronavirus Cancer Monitoring Project (UKCCMP) is a prospective cohort study conducted at 69 UK cancer hospitals among adult patients (≥18 years) with an active cancer and a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients registered from March 18 to August 1, 2020, were included in this analysis. Exposures: SACT, tumor subtype, patient demographic characteristics (eg, age, sex, body mass index, race and ethnicity, smoking history), and comorbidities were investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was all-cause mortality within the primary hospitalization. Results: Overall, 2515 of 2786 patients registered during the study period were included; 1464 (58%) were men; and the median (IQR) age was 72 (62-80) years. The mortality rate was 38% (966 patients). The data suggest an association between higher mortality in patients with hematological malignant neoplasms irrespective of recent SACT, particularly in those with acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndrome (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.30-3.60) and myeloma or plasmacytoma (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.04-2.26). Lung cancer was also significantly associated with higher COVID-19-related mortality (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.11-2.25). No association between higher mortality and receiving chemotherapy in the 4 weeks before COVID-19 diagnosis was observed after correcting for the crucial confounders of age, sex, and comorbidities. An association between lower mortality and receiving immunotherapy in the 4 weeks before COVID-19 diagnosis was observed (immunotherapy vs no cancer therapy: OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study of patients with active cancer suggest that recent SACT is not associated with inferior outcomes from COVID-19 infection. This has relevance for the care of patients with cancer requiring treatment, particularly in countries experiencing an increase in COVID-19 case numbers. Important differences in outcomes among patients with hematological and lung cancers were observed.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCOVID-19Drug TherapyFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRegistriesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID35188551
PMCPMC8861846
OpenAlexW4212971961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.