Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188545›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

Cholinergic and hippocampal systems facilitate cross-domain cognitive recovery after stroke.

Michael J O'Sullivan, Lena K L Oestreich, Paul Wright, Andrew N Clarkson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic Stroke.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael J O'SullivanUQ Centre for Clinical Research and Institute of Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2869-4580
Lena K L OestreichUQ Centre for Clinical Research and Institute of Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Paul WrightInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5297-6257
Andrew N ClarksonDepartment of Anatomy, Brain Health Research Centre and Brain Research New Zealand, University of Otago, Dunedin 9011, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-3834
The University of Queensland · AUBrain Research New Zealand · NZKing's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K022113/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous recovery of motor and cognitive function occurs in many individuals after stroke. The mechanisms are incompletely understood, but may involve neurotransmitter systems that support neural plasticity, networks that are involved in learning and regions of the brain that are able to flexibly adapt to demand (such as the 'multiple-demand system'). Forty-two patients with first symptomatic ischaemic stroke were enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study of cognitive function after stroke. High-resolution volumetric, diffusion MRI and neuropsychological assessment were performed at a mean of 70 ± 18 days after stroke. Cognitive assessment was repeated 1 year after stroke, using parallel test versions to avoid learning effects, and change scores were computed for long-term episodic, short-term and working memory. Structural MRI features that predicted change in cognitive scores were identified by a two-stage analysis: a discovery phase used whole-brain approaches in a hypothesis-free unbiased way; and an independent focused phase, where measurements were derived from regions identified in the discovery phase, using targeted volumetric measurements or tractography. Evaluation of the cholinergic basal forebrain, based on a validated atlas-based approach, was included given prior evidence of a role in neural plasticity. The status of the fornix, cholinergic basal forebrain and a set of hippocampal subfields were found to predict improvement in long-term memory performance. In contrast to prior expectation, the same pattern was found for short-term and working memory, suggesting that these regions are part of a common infrastructure that supports recovery across cognitive domains. Associations between cholinergic basal forebrain volume and cognitive recovery were found primarily in subregions associated with the nucleus basalis of Meynert, suggesting that it is the cholinergic outflow to the neocortex that enables recovery. Support vector regression models derived from baseline measurements of fornix, cholinergic basal forebrain and hippocampal subfields were able to explain 62% of change in long-term episodic and 41% of change in working memory performance over the subsequent 9 months. The results suggest that the cholinergic system and extended hippocampal network play key roles in cognitive recovery after stroke. Evaluation of these systems early after stroke may inform personalized therapeutic strategies to enhance recovery.

Indexed as

Basal ForebrainBrain IschemiaStrokeCholinergic AgentsCognitionHippocampusHumansLongitudinal StudiesCholinergic Agentshippocampusmemoryneuroplasticityprognosisstroke

Identifiers

PMID35188545
PMCPMC9166559
OpenAlexW4213313546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.