Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188540›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

Does rapid sequence divergence preclude RNA structure conservation in vertebrates?

Stefan E Seemann, Aashiq H Mirza, Claus H Bang-Berthelsen, Christian Garde, Mikkel Christensen-Dalsgaard, Christopher T Workman, Flemming Pociot, Niels Tommerup, Jan Gorodkin, Walter L Ruzzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefan E SeemannCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-4927
Aashiq H MirzaCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Claus H Bang-BerthelsenCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian GardeCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel Christensen-DalsgaardCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher T WorkmanCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2210-3743
Flemming PociotCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels TommerupCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jan GorodkinCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5823-4000
Walter L RuzzoCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health (RTH), University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-2926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accelerated evolution of any portion of the genome is of significant interest, potentially signaling positive selection of phenotypic traits and adaptation. Accelerated evolution remains understudied for structured RNAs, despite the fact that an RNA's structure is often key to its function. RNA structures are typically characterized by compensatory (structure-preserving) basepair changes that are unexpected given the underlying sequence variation, i.e., they have evolved through negative selection on structure. We address the question of how fast the primary sequence of an RNA can change through evolution while conserving its structure. Specifically, we consider predicted and known structures in vertebrate genomes. After careful control of false discovery rates, we obtain 13 de novo structures (and three known Rfam structures) that we predict to have rapidly evolving sequences-defined as structures where the primary sequences of human and mouse have diverged at least twice as fast (1.5 times for Rfam) as nearby neutrally evolving sequences. Two of the three known structures function in translation inhibition related to infection and immune response. We conclude that rapid sequence divergence does not preclude RNA structure conservation in vertebrates, although these events are relatively rare.

Indexed as

GenomeRNAAnimalsEvolution, MolecularMicePhylogenyVertebratesRNA

Identifiers

PMID35188540
PMCPMC8934657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.