Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188375›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2022

Chemical Evolution of Natural Product Structure.

Michael Grigalunas, Susanne Brakmann, Herbert Waldmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A Predictive Model for Thiol Reactivity ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  18. Novel p-Hydroxybenzoic Acid Derivative Isolated fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. An Indole Dearomatization Strategy for the Synthesis of Pseudo-Natural Products.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  20. High-throughput protein crystallography to empower natural product-based drug discovery.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2025
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael GrigalunasMax-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn Strasse 11, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0419-8168
Susanne BrakmannFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Otto-Hahn Strasse 4a, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-3735
Herbert WaldmannMax-Planck-Institute of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn Strasse 11, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9606-7247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural products are the result of Nature's exploration of biologically relevant chemical space through evolution and an invaluable source of bioactive small molecules for chemical biology and medicinal chemistry. Novel concepts for the discovery of new bioactive compound classes based on natural product structure may enable exploration of wider biologically relevant chemical space. The pseudo-natural product concept merges the relevance of natural product structure with efficient exploration of chemical space by means of fragment-based compound development to inspire the discovery of new bioactive chemical matter through

Indexed as

Biological ProductsCheminformaticsEvolution, ChemicalHumansBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID35188375
PMCPMC8895405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.