Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35188206›Full record

ArticleJournal of AOAC International2022

Development of Kudzu (Pueraria Montana var. lobata) Reference Materials for the Determination of Isoflavones and Toxic Elements.

J Andreas Lippert, Catherine A Rimmer, Melissa M Phillips, Michael A Nelson, Charles A Barber, Laura J Wood, Stephen E Long, Colleen E Bryan, Katherine E Sharpless, James Yen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of AOAC International, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Preventive nutrition and food science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J Andreas LippertNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4284-5573
Catherine A RimmerNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-6629
Melissa M PhillipsNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0477-7637
Michael A NelsonNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0503-4501
Charles A BarberNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4968-7486
Laura J WoodNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4294-7636
Stephen E LongNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5764-0744
Colleen E BryanNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-3925
Katherine E SharplessNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Chemical Sciences Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6569-198X
James YenNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Statistical Engineering Division, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5242-7629
Adam J KuszakNational Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8719-145X
Stephen A WiseNational Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0021-1970

Funding

National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements (NIH-ODS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn collaboration with the Office of Dietary Supplements at the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Standards and Technology issued a suite of botanical matrix reference materials (RMs) and Standard Reference Material® (SRM) for determination of isoflavones and toxic elements in kudzu dietary supplement ingredients.

objectiveRM 8650 Pueraria montana var. lobata (Kudzu) Rhizome, SRM 3268 Pueraria montana var. lobata (Kudzu) Extract, and RM 8652 Kudzu-Containing Solid Oral Dosage Form were issued with values assigned for isoflavones (puerarin, daidzin, and daidzein), toxic elements (arsenic, cadmium, and lead), and selenium.

methodsIsoflavone values were assigned using liquid chromatography with UV absorbance or mass spectrometry detection. Element values were assigned using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and results from an interlaboratory comparison exercise.

resultsMass fractions for puerarin were 32.2 ± 3.2 mg/g, 128 ± 13 mg/g, and 68.2 ± 6.9 mg/g in RM 8650, SRM 3268, and RM 8652, respectively. Arsenic increases from 156 ± 14 ng/g to 849 ± 83 ng/g and cadmium decreases from 348 ± 14 ng/g to 82.1 ± 4.9 ng/g from rhizome to extract.

conclusionThe kudzu RM/SRM suite complements previously issued soy-related SRMs with values assigned for isoflavones, which have been studied for their potential health benefits, and expands the analytical resource by providing values for puerarin, an isoflavone not found in soy. HIGHLIGHTS: The three new kudzurmaterials are for use in the determination of isoflavones, toxic elements, and selenium. For the isoflavones, these new kudzu materials provide higher levels of daidzin and daidzein than existing soy-related SRMs, and they provide a value for an isoflavone not in existing SRMs (puerarin). Toxic elements in RM 8650 and SRM 3268 provide new botanical matrixes for use by dietary supplement manufacturers for the verification of the safety of their raw materials.

Indexed as

ArsenicIsoflavonesPuerariaSeleniumCadmiumArsenicCadmiumIsoflavonesSelenium

Identifiers

PMID35188206
PMCPMC9425844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.