ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
High-performance single-cell gene regulatory network inference at scale: the Inferelator 3.0.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks in Stem Cells: Methods and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Review
- Problems With GO Enrichment as an Endpoint for Ecological Omics Interpretation.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- GLM-Prior: a genomic language model for transferable sequence-derived priors in gene regulatory network inference.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Computational blueprints for cell fate programming.Stem cell reports · 2026Review
- Histone deacetylases and cell-cycle regulators orchestrate cell-identity transitions during Arabidopsis root regeneration.Molecular plant · 2026Article
- Systematic design of combination therapy by targeting master regulators of coexisting diffuse midline glioma cell states.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Article
- Inferring fungal cis-regulatory networks from genome sequences via unsupervised and interpretable representation learning.Genetics · 2026Article
- Modeling strategies forBioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- scRegulate: single-cell regulatory-embedded variational inference of transcription factor activity from gene expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Combining Motifs, CRE Activity, And Gene Expression Data Using ML Greatly Improves the Accuracy of Tissue-Specific TF Network Maps.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mapping the transcriptional regulatory network of a fungal pathogen by exploiting transcription factor perturbation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Leveraging transcription factor physical proximity for enhancing gene regulation inference.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Leveraging prior knowledge to infer gene regulatory networks from single-cell RNA-sequencing data.Molecular systems biology · 2025Review
- Enhancer Dynamics and Spatial Organization Drive Anatomically Restricted Cellular States in the Human Spinal Cord.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Perspective on recent developments and challenges in regulatory and systems genomics.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
- NetREm: Network Regression Embeddings reveal cell-type transcription factor coordination for gene regulation.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Augusta: From RNA-Seq to gene regulatory networks and Boolean models.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Deciphering lineage-relevant gene regulatory networks during endoderm formation by InPheRNo-ChIP.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGene regulatory networks define regulatory relationships between transcription factors and target genes within a biological system, and reconstructing them is essential for understanding cellular growth and function. Methods for inferring and reconstructing networks from genomics data have evolved rapidly over the last decade in response to advances in sequencing technology and machine learning. The scale of data collection has increased dramatically; the largest genome-wide gene expression datasets have grown from thousands of measurements to millions of single cells, and new technologies are on the horizon to increase to tens of millions of cells and above.
resultsIn this work, we present the Inferelator 3.0, which has been significantly updated to integrate data from distinct cell types to learn context-specific regulatory networks and aggregate them into a shared regulatory network, while retaining the functionality of the previous versions. The Inferelator is able to integrate the largest single-cell datasets and learn cell-type-specific gene regulatory networks. Compared to other network inference methods, the Inferelator learns new and informative Saccharomyces cerevisiae networks from single-cell gene expression data, measured by recovery of a known gold standard. We demonstrate its scaling capabilities by learning networks for multiple distinct neuronal and glial cell types in the developing Mus musculus brain at E18 from a large (1.3 million) single-cell gene expression dataset with paired single-cell chromatin accessibility data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The inferelator software is available on GitHub (https://github.com/flatironinstitute/inferelator) under the MIT license and has been released as python packages with associated documentation (https://inferelator.readthedocs.io/). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.