Observational studyInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2022
Treatment pattern, satisfaction, and productivity loss of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Korea: A multicenter cross-sectional observational study.
Observational study in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Burden of disease, pain catastrophizing, and central sensitization in relation to work-related issues in young spondyloarthritis patients.Reumatologia · 2024Article
- Satisfaction with medication in older adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases: a multicenter cross-sectional observational study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Observational
- Measurement of pre-treatment inflammatory cytokine levels is valuable for prediction of treatment efficacy to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in axial spondyloarthritis patients.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2022Article
- Treatment pattern, satisfaction, and productivity loss of patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Korea: A multicenter cross-sectional observational study.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo provide in-depth understanding of real-world tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment patterns in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and treatment satisfaction, productivity loss, and associated factors.
methodsThis was a multicenter observational hybrid retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey study. Disease activity and physical functioning were measured using the Bath AS Disease Activity Index and Bath AS Functional Index, respectively. Treatment satisfaction was determined with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). Productivity loss was evaluated using the Korean version of the World Health Organization-Health and Work Performance Questionnaire.
resultsA total of 497 patients were enrolled (mean age 40.3 years, 85.3% male, mean AS duration 10 years). The mean duration of TNFi treatment was 6.2 years. Among the four TNFi considered, adalimumab (39.6%) and etanercept (23.5%) were most commonly used at study enrollment. The TSQM convenience domain score was lower than scores in the effectiveness, adverse effects, and global satisfaction domains. Subcutaneous syringe-type injection and intravenous injection were associated with lower patient convenience satisfaction than subcutaneous pen-type injection. Increased costs of lost productivity time were associated with female sex, unemployed status, and higher disease activity.
conclusionsThe most frequently prescribed TNFi was adalimumab, followed by etanercept. Etanercept was used for the longest duration. More convenient treatment options may enhance overall treatment satisfaction. Considerable loss in productivity due to AS was observed in this study. To reflect patients' perspectives, further attention should be paid to factors associated with treatment satisfaction and productivity loss when selecting treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.