Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35187791›Full record

ArticleChemMedChem2022

Synthesis and in vitro Study of Artemisinin/Synthetic Peroxide-Based Hybrid Compounds against SARS-CoV-2 and Cancer.

Lars Herrmann, Ivan A Yaremenko, Aysun Çapcı, Julia Struwe, Dhanir Tailor, Arpit Dheeraj, Jan Hodek, Yulia Yu Belyakova, Peter S Radulov, Jan Weber and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemMedChem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Bridged 1,2,4-Trioxolanes: SnClMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Lars HerrmannOrganic Chemistry Chair I and Interdisciplinary Center for Molecular Materials (ICMM), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nikolaus Fiebiger-Straße 10, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Ivan A YaremenkoN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky prosp., 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-1068-9051
Aysun ÇapcıOrganic Chemistry Chair I and Interdisciplinary Center for Molecular Materials (ICMM), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nikolaus Fiebiger-Straße 10, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Julia StruweInstitut für Organische und Biomolekulare Chemie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Tammannstraße 2, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Dhanir TailorDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 97201, Portland, OR, USA.
Arpit DheerajDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 97201, Portland, OR, USA.
Jan HodekInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo namesti 2, 16610, Prague, Czech Republic.
Yulia Yu BelyakovaN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky prosp., 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Peter S RadulovN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky prosp., 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-2653-0395
Jan WeberInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo namesti 2, 16610, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2799-7352
Sanjay V MalhotraDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Cancer Biology, Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 97201, Portland, OR, USA.
Alexander O Terent'evN. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky prosp., 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-8018-031X
Lutz AckermannInstitut für Organische und Biomolekulare Chemie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Tammannstraße 2, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7034-8772
Svetlana B TsogoevaOrganic Chemistry Chair I and Interdisciplinary Center for Molecular Materials (ICMM), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nikolaus Fiebiger-Straße 10, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4845-0951
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry · RUFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEOregon Health & Science University · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry · CZGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The newly emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cause life-threatening diseases in millions of people worldwide, in particular, in patients with cancer, and there is an urgent need for antiviral agents against this infection. While in vitro activities of artemisinins against SARS-CoV-2 and cancer have recently been demonstrated, no study of artemisinin and/or synthetic peroxide-based hybrid compounds active against both cancer and SARS-CoV-2 has been reported yet. However, the hybrid drug's properties (e. g., activity and/or selectivity) can be improved compared to its parent compounds and effective new agents can be obtained by modification/hybridization of existing drugs or bioactive natural products. In this study, a series of new artesunic acid and synthetic peroxide based new hybrids were synthesized and analyzed in vitro for the first time for their inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 and leukemia cell lines. Several artesunic acid-derived hybrids exerted a similar or stronger potency against K562 leukemia cells (81-83 % inhibition values) than the reference drug doxorubicin (78 % inhibition value) and they were also more efficient than their parent compounds artesunic acid (49.2 % inhibition value) and quinoline derivative (5.5 % inhibition value). Interestingly, the same artesunic acid-quinoline hybrids also show inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro (EC

Indexed as

ArtemisininsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentLeukemiaNeoplasmsQuinolinesAnimalsAntiviral AgentsChlorocebus aethiopsHumansPeroxidesSARS-CoV-2Vero CellsAntiviral AgentsartemisininArtemisininsPeroxidesQuinolinesanti-cancer compoundsanti-leukemia agentsanti-SARS-CoV-2 compoundsartemisinin based hybrids

Identifiers

PMID35187791
PMCPMC9086992
OpenAlexW4213112613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.